SEO AIO GEO

Out of context: Reply #4

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 6 Responses
  • yuekit0

    Based on my experience AI actually provides a huge opportunity for SEO content generation. You can ask "Deep Research" to write an article centered around a particular keyword and it will generally go out and pull information from the top ranked webpages for that term. So this is a nice way to take what's already ranking and create a better version.

    You can also download a spreadsheet of keywords from apps like SEMrush and tell the AI to weave them into the text.

    Using this approach I have gotten into the top 10 for high-volume keywords again and again. And not only that, Google will often use my AI-generated articles in its AI overview.

    • <kingsteven
    • ive seen ai generated content punished time and time again, each algorithm update seems to remove them which is why we write everything ourselves.trooperbill
    • Wait. Say this back to me, but pretending that I am incredibly stupid (not too much of a conceit, to be fair)?
      I'd Like To Know More.
      Nairn
    • Why the web is so shit now - regurgitated and elongated content for SEO not users.mort_
    • Keep in mind AI generated content could be anything. I'm talking about using AI tools to write very in-depth articles for organic SEO.yuekit
    • @Nairn Basically content creation as a lead generation strategy. We try to dominate all the keywords in our space, it's better than paying for ads.yuekit
    • trooper I'm not convinced it applies across the board, I think they are targeting "AI slop" and low value, auto-generated content. For me using AI is more a wayyuekit
    • to write the "definitive" article on a topic (Deep Research is very good for this) while working in keywords. My client is in the logistics industry and there'syuekit
    • a huge amount of informational content you can create around that.yuekit
    • mort_ Google fired their head of search quality when their paid revenue dropped. its now run exclusively to maximise paid revenuetrooperbill
    • yuekit the problem with ai written content is it doesnt add value its just generated on what already exists. just parsing existing info.trooperbill
    • That's true of almost everything though. Wikipedia is just parsing existing info and yet it tends to rank well. There's value in being the most comprehensiveyuekit
    • resource for a given topic. Anyway what I'm describing isn't dramatically different from the strategy you posted above.yuekit
    • This is the web circling the drain. Content for search placement, rather than users, is an arms-race that will drive away all traffic.monNom
    • Search results in many categories are already nearly worthless. More 'long-form' seo content simply adds extra haystacks on top of the needle. Users will flee.monNom
    • ^mort_
    • $300 billion annual revenue from ads is why.mort_
    • If you make a useful informational guide for people and it happens to help with SEO, why is that bad exactly?yuekit
    • It's more the misuse of the method than your particular application yuekit.mort_
    • Or abuse of the method rather.mort_

View thread