Artificial Intelligence

Out of context: Reply #1244

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 1,314 Responses
  • jonny_quest_lives1

    • +1Nairn
    • jackson pollock had a point of view?imbecile
    • I mean, yeah?Nairn
    • I think there;s a real difference between 'using AI end-to-end' and 'using AI to achieve multiple small assets, put together by a human'.Nairn
    • Pollock, as much as I couldn't give a shit about his work, utilised an abstract tool to 'create something'. Samesame prompters, prompting.Nairn
    • It's prompts, all the way down.
      Just some are buckets of paint with a hole in the bottom, attached to a bit of string.
      And thereafter, belief.
      Nairn
    • pollack globbing paint haphazardly is about the same as throwing random prompts out. they both give the same resultimbecile
    • point there is you can get as much out of something as you want. why don't we belittle talentless painters enjoying themselves?imbecile
    • hate for ai is fear of ai. no more no less. a tool capable of more or less depending on who weilds it, not unlike every other tool.imbecile
    • does owning a chisel make me a master sculptor? why is everyone afriad of a digital output? seems like a personal issue.imbecile
    • a bunch of digital karens yelling up at the cloudimbecile

View thread