Photography
Photography
Out of context: Reply #349
- Started
- Last post
- 366 Responses
- Gnash0
Why were cameras so much better in 1900?
- Maybe it wasn't the cameras.palimpsest
- They colorized and often enhanced the image by painting in a ton of details. So, no they weren’t betterfuturefood
- Maybe the light was different back thenGnash
- Colours we’re also different before WW1Gnash
- This is fake, we all know it was black and white back then.ephix
- Because put used to put effort into things back then?slappy
- Prompt Engineers were shit on back then.utopian
- bottom one looks more realistic + all the figures in the top one look very staged.milfhunter
- Didn't they have to be super still in the poses as it was more like a long exposure. Or https://www.qbn.com/…PhanLo
- The use photoshopGabriel
- @phanlo. Well, it’s a known fact the people moved slower back then so that helped the exposureGnash
- Hence the term ‘fast-paced’ to describe mordere lifeGnash
- We also have to take into account that there were less humans at that time so Earth was lighter. This helped reduce exposure time.palimpsest
- You’re right that the earth was lighter then, but only because the USA was still young and everyone wasn’t fat yetGnash
- Also, more people believed in god back then. As the souls left the atheists bodies they got lighter. So it kinda evens outsGnash
- daniel 5:27Gnash
- OmG WhY CamERa BeTRER
https://i.imgur.com/…kingsteven - lol. I can’t believe you took the time to do that. But I can believe that you didn’t get that the post was a jokeGnash
- QBN always delivers.palimpsest
- It truly doesGnash
- lol don't get too excited. It was drag and drop on an an ai colouriser websitekingsteven
- Don't fret, I'm wearing Depends.palimpsest