blog
blog
Out of context: Reply #75052
- Started
- Last post
- 76,752 Responses
- Krassy1
- none. the bottle is empty.********
- Agree on none. Even if the bottle is full it's not enough to FILL one glass.palimpsest
- 3?Krassy
- Depending on the amount and flow rate it could be 1.palimpsest
- 2 pints of a slow pour = 7.palimpsest
- 1-2-3-4 -> you are just dumb
5-6-7 -> you are blind and bumb******** - Hold on, sted is right. You can't get to 7 without going through 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6.palimpsest
- even if the liquid overflows the rest you still can't fill no 7. its just your complexity bias talking :)
https://i.imgur.com/…******** - There is no glass.
Then you'll see that it's not the glass that gets filled-up, only yourself.palimpsest - :))))********
- The water can go from 1 to 7 without going through 2. What am I blind to?monospaced
- Oh. Blocked tubes. Feh.monospaced
- So it’s 4monospaced
- Or 6. I’m just stupid. Carry on.monospaced
- It's 3, happy birthday.palimpsest
- Basic physics will help here.cotton
- Lucky Seven. My liver is twitching.stoplying
- 3 is the only one that will ever fill - and then will overflow anything else additionally poured.theonlyengineerhere
- ^ I'd trust the engineer here on this, folks.Continuity
- It's 3!
(look closely and you'll see that both 6 & 7 are blocked going into from 3)Krassy - 3x3=9+5=14x6=84-35=4...
7 is the correct answer!utopian - rotfl********
- basic physics -> the bottle is empty :D********
- I didn’t notice the little blockages. This was just as much a test at noticing the details which kinda takes away from the physics part. Mehmonospaced
- amusingly, it's the 'follow the science' guys who get things most wrongzardoz
- none. the bottle is empty.