Coronavirus

Out of context: Reply #6242

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 6,399 Responses
  • Nairn9

    ^
    See, this is why the shit that people that you spout is so untrustworthy.

    You link an article (from teh Mail no less) and add a quote that isn't in there, then ignore the quote that is there, all tyhe while ignoring the reason THE DAILY MAIL would want to highlight negatives of unionised strike action.

    'Experts are baffled' where is that in that article?

    Whereas you ignore the lede:

    'Our own analysis indicates that an estimated 300-500 patients are dying per week across the UK associated with long waiting times in emergency departments'

    Nairn 9Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • Also, your wee quip about how stupid it'd be to expect profit from DaFont the other day shows how completely inept you are at statistics. Fuckit, just maths.Nairn
    • If a site has 23M users and there's even a 1/1000 chance that a download could convert to profit from a company that's... well, 2,300 potential profits.Nairn
    • Unexplained excess death is unexplained excess death, regardless of whether it's the daily mail or the bbc reporting it. Unexplained means they don't know why..Rendle
    • do you know what baffled means? I think it said that in the link I clicked to get to the article. Why are you picking me up on that meaningless issue...Rendle
    • ... and not the topic at hand? Oh I said baffled, when maybe I should have said what? Confused? Unexplained?Rendle
    • Why don't we discuss the actual issue, you half wit?Rendle
    • Here's other sources if you can't understand content from certain sources.
      https://www.newscien…      Rendle
    • and your favourite, I'm sure, the BBC
      https://www.bbc.co.u…      Rendle
    • and if you think 1 in every 1000 users on a free font website are looking to pay for fonts then you truly are a half wit beyond measure.Rendle
    • I like how you're pulling me up on ANYTHING you possibly can, aside from the fact 50,000 people more than usual died in 2022 and they can't explain it.Rendle
    • 'potential profits' and companies would be expcted to pay. What was it you said about people resorting to insults rather than making a point, a while back?Nairn
    • It's not just the UK either... https://healthfeedba…Rendle
    • I'm not bothering addressing any of your points - Yuekit does a good job of that whilst highlighting your statistical ineptitude yet you still ignore it all.Nairn
    • The fact that the daily mail, the new scientist and the bbc don't even CONSIDER that MIGHT be the experimental injection they just rolled out, speaks volumes.Rendle
    • but you'd rather talk about which word I used to describe the fact that they don't know what's causing all the excess death, rather than the excess death. IdiotRendle
    • Sorry to butt in, but are you conflating 50,000 deaths to the vaccine? Out of 8 billion people that's not a great deal, but understandably useful to know why.Ianbolton
    • Sorry, my comment was for the below post, not nairns post. SozIanbolton
    • For a start, that's the UK alone, so it's 50k out of 67 million, not 8 billion. Secondly, I'm not conflating anything.Rendle
    • The articles you link to list several reasons as to why there are increased deaths. Stresses on the NHS, Population Age, Climate, Treatment waiting times. The..Morning_star
    • BBC article even includes a paragraph discounting the vaccine as an unlikely cause. You seem to have an unhelpful bias in your reasoning.Morning_star
    • Oh right, that's settled then.
      LOL      Rendle
    • Lol dude your bbc article clearly states that it was way below the excess deaths during the pandemic. Stop cherry picking misinformation._niko
    • Hey set remember what you said. "When you start to throw insult, you lose the argument" lol you dimwit hypocritepango
    • cool coolrobotinc
    • Rendle, COVID is still a novel disease with a pathology that is mainly unknown. Most diseases have been around for millennia, but COVID is just 3 years old...ptrdo
    • ...COVID is a biphasic infection with significant coagulopathy and immune dysfunction. No one knows what happens after ten years or dozens of infections...ptrdo
    • ...What is known is that COVID makes chronic conditions acute, and facilitates the demise of people with comorbidities...ptrdo
    • ...People are dying every day with pathologies that are not fully understood, but some day could be found to have been exacerbated by COVID infection...ptrdo
    • ...It took thousands of years to determine that polio caused paralysis. It's taken 40 years to understand HIV. It could take decades to know what COVID has done.ptrdo
    • Vaccines are an emulation of human biology that's proven safe and effective for a generation. They are safer than aspirin. COVID is not. It's a killer.ptrdo
    • Everything I read about corona, from either side, is equally convincing. I have given updrgs
    • mRNA 'vaccines' are a brand new thing. They didn't test these vaccines for more than a year. Most vaccines go through ten years of testing before releaseRendle
    • You're saying that COVID is novel and we have no idea the affects, but untested, experimental, gene editing injections are definitely not causing illness & deatRendle
    • Is that genuinely what you're saying? A new variant of the flu is causing heart attacks and strokes but an experimental injection isn'tRendle
    • And anyone who suggests there might be a link gets ridiculed, attacked, banned and censored. But discussing the flu is fair game...Rendle
    • Basically it has to be exactly as the benevolent, caring, altruistic, kind and charitable government and big pharma tell you it is. Otherwise you're crazyRendle
    • And you can't see the insanity of that?Rendle
    • Coo.Nairn
    • That's pretty much what I thought.
      Sad times.      Rendle
    • It's like trying to discuss Shakespeare with a dog. Clearly I'm the idiot for trying.Rendle
    • So deliciously un-self aware!
      ptrdo stood up and gave you the response you [clearly actually didn't] want and bless, you ridiculed. Sublime.      Nairn
    • Coo-fucking-coo you stupid, stupid pigeon.Nairn
    • Rendle, vaccines did not “take 10 years” to test because that was required, but because that is the amount of time it took to gather sufficient data...ptrdo
    • ...COVID vaccines were developed in the midst of an active pandemic with exceptional prevalence. It was everywhere and data could be collected quickly and easily...ptrdo
    • ...mRNA employs a new methodology for i antigen, but the fundamentals are exactly the same as other vaccines—to trigger a perfectly natural human immune response...ptrdo
    • ...Look around you. Our return to relative normalcy is the result of billions of doses of vaccine. There is no other factor that could have made that happen...ptrdo
    • ...COVID is as infectious & deadly as it's ever been. In fact, Omicron is even more so than previous strains. Yet spread is now subdued, and this is significant.ptrdo
    • ...Polio vaccines may have been developed over “10 years,” but that was a relatively rare disease, and we have FAR more advanced know-how and technologies now.ptrdo
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread