The Russia thread.
Out of context: Reply #629
- Started
- Last post
- 1,079 Responses
- cherub0
^That is worrying. Honestly that plus the nuclear power plant being deliberately targeted I'm realizing now that the west is falling way WAY behind. Now how would you retake the power plants safety? You can't. He can just threaten to rip a hole in that part of Europe by nuking the sites on purpose.
All of you here on QBN, and Stoltenberg, and Ursala Vandelyon and the whole west are making a huge mistake.
We are falling far far behind. Hitler was allowed to do this because he intimidated the west... hinting at going nuclear and the west fell for it. The truth is the moment someone threatens something like that they've already decided to do it at some point. So we never had anything to lose. It's clear now.
Stoltenberg says no to a no fly zone. The west is busy thinking of new sanctions.
This is us right now.
- Just surround them. Eventually they will get hungry. Using a nuclear powerplant as a giant dirty bomb is the same as launching a warhead. Nobody wins.monNom
- cutting off supply subsequently starving people is war crime according to Geneva convention. tho i'm sure there's a loop hole.pango
- There is. Soldiers are fair game. If they surrender, then you have to treat them well. But that's what you want anyway.monNom
- Looks like you don't understand that this is exactly what the putler wants.
Close the sky over UA=WW4
Join the fight as NATO=WW4******** - This way all the countries can run their own "special operation", without any official solider stepping into the territory of Ukraine.********
- ^^ following that logic sted, this war was already lost before it even began due to the very existence of NATO. Just admit it he did a fist pump and we flinchedcherub
- Because European leaders are not warmongers (thank god). But this also means they knew the danger and decided appeasement was safer. Didn't work in WWII either.cherub