FUCK ADOBE!

Out of context: Reply #488

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 715 Responses
  • PhanLo0

    PhanLo 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • so after it failed in Photoshop, not they add 3D to Ai

      smh      grafician
    • oh good, add more bloat and don't fix all the shite I've gained grey hairs from.shapesalad
    • yeah.. that seems shit. why couldn't they make a 3d cube system, that is all vectors, allows groups, and has a simple soft shadow that renders as gradient.shapesalad
    • something like that would spur a whole new style of illustration. or a spline sweep too. simple 3d tools, no bloat, no ray trace, creativity unleashed.shapesalad
    • Like with Adobe Dimensions back in 1993? That actually works better than current Adobe 3d shit. It was all vector and easy to use.PhanLo
    • it's like nobody at Adobe even watches this thread!grafician
    • FFS. Add some more half-baked features to justify constant updates to fix the half baked features and repeat. Anyone fancy starting a food truck?MrT
    • Thing is AI already had 3D tools that very few folks used; Basically Adobe Dimensions was rolled into it long ago.evilpeacock
    • This is not bad, we're playing with the betas for a few weeks, it has a really nice library.sted
    • Look at 3:16... the shadow cuts off like a rectangleProjectile
    • @Projectile, there's a shadow boundary slider where you can increase the area for the shadow boundary.monospaced
    • The shadows being cutoff can be fixed by a shadow area parameter.CyBrainX
    • As true as this review is, Illustrator's 3D is still way better than what was in Photoshop.CyBrainX
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread