Figma

Out of context: Reply #22

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 59 Responses
  • CyBrainX0

    If you don't work in UX/UI, is there any benefit to using it instead of Adobe software?

    CyBrainX 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • Seems like a decent iconography tool?canoe
    • I'm having a hard time imagining how or why somebody not in UI/UX would use Figma.MondoMorphic
    • ...e.g., there are tools like Miro that are better for collaborative uses, Adobe tools are better for graphic design, etc.MondoMorphic
    • I was just curious because I come across job postings for Motion Design that mention Figma. I think the problem is that a lot of people looking for someone...CyBrainX
    • mocking up UX/UI designs asks for a motion designer.CyBrainX
    • Figjam is a bit like Miro but freeChimp
    • Figjam will not be free starting Jan 1nb
    • The only reason a non-UX/UI designer would consider Figma is for the collaborative aspect of it. If you want that, then great. Also much cheaper than Adob¢.nb
    • Of course it's not fair to compare price. Adobe offers a ton of apps for that money.nb
    • ^most of them useless?grafician
    • It's a visual cloud based collaboration tool. I use it for more than UX/UI work absolutely.atomholc
    • I used Adobe XD for prototyping three or four times. It was fun to use and easy to learn. At least for what i needed it to.oey_oey
    • Some prototyping like transitions in a website like hover and clicks I did in AE.oey_oey
    • But for this client's website, I'm really thinking in using Figma because the client wants something I can not agree upon...oey_oey
    • and I need to show it to her somehow and I don't feel like doing it with the website itself and have all the work done and then go back. the budget is final.oey_oey
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread