Coronavirus

Out of context: Reply #5511

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 6,399 Responses
  • whatthefunk7

    This also does not include the people waiting for surgery/etc that die because the hospitals are full with unvaxxed covidiots.

    whatthefunk 7Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • Do you reckon the US is on the way to 1 million deaths? Even that seems obscenePhanLo
    • ^ by Xmasgrafician
    • EVERY YEAR 1% of population dies. How is it a news to anyone?pr2
    • besides, whoever wrote this takes numbers out of his/her ass. according to CDC so far there were 12 mil hospitalizations out of 110mil infected Americans.pr2
    • no wonder some of you guys live in permanent fear if you listen to quacks pulling numbers out of thin air.pr2
    • Daffy Duck voice. You never responded to my other thread, btw.garbage
    • garbage still watches cartoons that were out of print the past 20 years...pr2
    • who prints cartoons? pr2 you're obviously just trying to convince yourself. no one here is listening to you anymore.sarahfailin
    • 1% more people dying will "destroy" the economy? 1% die anyway, 2% will die and that's a catastrophe?? Where the fuck does he get the conjecture from?Khurram
    • DOWNVOTEKhurram
    • And no I don't give a FUCK about 3million of you dying, nor your 99-year-old economically redundant granny either. Sorry to break it to youKhurram
    • all of you overeducated know that this is on the top of the average number of dead right?
      Khurram yes it can cripple the economy.      sted
    • depends on who those 3million are, doesn't it sted... !!!!Khurram
    • Yes but think about it this way:
      A 99-year-old economically redundant granny gets hospitalized right before you, she dies but while the doctors are struggling      sted
    • for her life you have to wait because you're young and more or less healthy. while you wait your body starts to develop the symptoms of a sars infectionsted
    • when doctors get to you to develop the treatment for your specific details, that body what had all the chances to survive without lasting effects is giving upsted
    • you survive, suffering from long-term side effects, and as a result you can't do any physical work nobody wants to hire you.sted
    • I know people coming off from a ventilator, recovering slowly. They aren't the same not just physically.sted
    • That's a compelling anecdote, sted, an a plausible hypothetical situation. I will add it to my "care" bucket and see if it tips my balance towards giving a fuckKhurram
    • NAHKhurram
    • https://thumbs.dream…scarabin
    • never in history did people worry so much about "what if of the future" disregarding hard science facts readily available right NOW.pr2
    • Except the survival rate is 99.7%. You can't get more brainwashed than this.Hayoth
    • Survival rate is 100% not the point, you dimbulb. You do realize there are long-term health effects? Oh wait, lol. You actually don't, do you?garbage
    • And Jan-October 2020 had 300,000 excess deaths, and about 200,000 are directly attributed to COVID. It's not really hard to wrap your mind around.garbage
    • lets have long-term lock downs so we can "avoid" long term consequences of covid - that's some genius thinking right there i tell you.pr2
    • I don't know how people can still be debating this. The reality you see on the ground totally contradicts the idea that it's not a threat.yuekit
    • Earlier this year India decided it's OK, no need for any lockdown and masks, we already beat the virus. So they went ahead with giant religious festivals...yuekit
    • And I guess pr2 you would have agreed with that approach right?yuekit
    • The result was that millions of people died in only this one country, the health system collapsed and there were mass cremations of bodies in every town.yuekit
    • https://apnews.com/a…yuekit
    • And of course they were forced to eventually do a lockdown anyway. No one wants lockdown, they are forced to by the situation getting out of control.yuekit
    • Don't waste your time. pr2 is the type that can't understand basic science and likes to scream about it. Or it's a bit. Either route is a sad route.garbage
    • Less than 1% of children get cancer every year. Should we stop treating it? Fuck you pr2. Go to hell seriously.monospaced
    • Maybe you'd say that children's cancer doctors wasted their time, because 1% of kids die every year anyway. Fuuuuuuuck you.monospaced
    • you guys are such dummies, it really baffles me that you can even find the power switch on your computers to turn it on/off.pr2
    • you convolute the issues bringing totally UNRELATED sets of data and facts that have no place to stand next to each other.pr2
    • you keep on jumping to GROSSLY OVERSIMPLIFIED conclusions as if every place on Earth was the same, had similar history, society...pr2
    • the saying "comparing apples to oranges" doesn't even apply to you because apples and oranges at least have a few factors in common.pr2
    • at first i though i was dealing with a bunch of ignoramuses but now it's getting sad as i'm talking to a bunch of kids with mental capacity of a moron.pr2
    • like, i know for some of you, no matter how clear, concise and specific data might be, it will still fly over your head. sad, so sad.pr2
    • look who's talkingmonospaced
    • It is satisfyingly hilarious to watch pr2 embody the Dunning-Kruger effect.garbage
    • Daffy Duck reads, and really punch out the ALL CAPS WRONG THINGS he says. "GROSSLY OVERSIMPLIFIED" was a hit.garbage
    • Did y'all graduate with honors at Gudger College? NO? Then shut up and let pr2 continue with he free lectures.FNP14
    • (lol @ Gudger College, I flunked out)garbage
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread