blog

Out of context: Reply #71789

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 76,745 Responses
  • doggydoggdog-1

    I know art is subjective and some processes can be interesting, but some artists' work is such bs.

    It never ceases to amaze me how a gallery can post a pic of some ugly crayon drawing or "sculpture" made of trash and have people fawn over it.

    • The arts community is a self-sustaining ecosystem funded by gov’t grants with almost no oversightGnash
    • Rule 23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”Hayoth
    • Rule 22 22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to....Hayoth
    • “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”Hayoth
    • the concept of "good sculpture" has suppressed the development of this creative field for centuries
      ********
    • the experiments of the last few decades are not yet enough to create creators that are widely recognized and lasting works for generations
      ********
    • You think Damien Hirst, Andy Goldsworthy, Antony Gormley (to name a few) will disappear into the ether and be forgotten?Morning_star
    • Anish Kapoor, Ron Mueck, Ai Weiwei?Morning_star
    • Ummm... Yes!OBBTKN
    • Why. Their public artworks are hardly disposable.Morning_star
    • Anish Kapoor is a prick, Ron Mueck is a god. their names do not belong in the same sentenceimbecile
    • Lots of artists are pricks. Doesn’t make their art any less powerful. What are your feelings about Jeff Koons?Morning_star
    • love koons. anish kapoor is an anti-artist. his copyrights are bs. i like cloudgateimbecile
    • i said copyright, but i meant trademarkimbecile
    • I appreciate old man Hayoths long standing effort to bring up communists in every side note he posts.inteliboy

View thread