Coronavirus
Coronavirus
Out of context: Reply #3862
- Started
- Last post
- 6,418 Responses
- utopian0
- that is awesome! with little hype about ventilators and packed icus seeing increases with little impact to major med issues********
- this is good news on multiple fronts. with increased testing showing its far more wide spread, and not lethal at all. almost like a common cold...********
- hitting the bottle again i seeutopian
- ...cos the common cold kills healthy people in their 20's and 30's or can leave them with MS type symptoms...microkorg
- deathboy they had 7 months to prepare and the ICUs are filling up you dense, stupid fuck.monospaced
- deathboy's correct. The mortality rate continues to drop, especially after hospitals were no longer incented to mischaracterize covid deaths.MondoMorphic
- No deathboy and you are both wrong. https://covid19.who.… feel free to check.ben_
- https://ibb.co/DkPwN… or in case you don't know how to work a ui, which wouldn't be inconceivable.ben_
- Thanks for the daily dose of stupid deathboy and mondo. Y'all should start a podcast.garbage
- Wait only sour e is ben which is odd click bait site********
- And I think it's related to who which mentioned they expect at least 10% global sat. U do the math********
- And micro the 20-30 deaths are a nothin burger. Any one dying in that range are special cases********
- Talking like .01 percent if that. And lil clarification on why. Absolute unknown for the medics********
- "The Great Covid-19 Versus Flu Comparison Revisited"
https://www.bloomber…dmay - “Weird clickbait site”? It’s the W.H.O. And it shows your mortality rates are not going down.ben_
- @ben "perform how can you mouse a c lick becaus it always in my bottom u if you take the fatalaties in mind u woudl knw too" - dbgarbage
- Well my original I wasn't talking of mortality rates just the hype train of lack of resources while numbers increase********
- But if u want to discuss mortality rate how about cdc 6% of all deaths covid only. Or breakdowns of actual lethalness in demographics. Because as we know more********
- We see far less risk vs avg. And in 85+ greater. But as expected . A major problem with numbers shown is fallacy of averages.********
- Can u walk across a river with an average depth of 5 feet. Average data is great but it's about application. And for media it's cancer********
- But avg. More cases less deaths =less mortality rate.********
- My point about the averages was directed to mondope. But you’re also being inaccurate saying it’s somehow “not lethal at all”. Anyhow...ben_
- I never said its not lethal. I just stated by evidence its lethalness is almost non existent for most people. older its equal to a hip break or pneumonia********
- but you did... "showing its far more wide spread, and not lethal at all." - your second note.ben_
- Even if that's your interpretation of your source, it's what you said.ben_
- Ben context. Not lethal at all in context o bubonic or spanish********
- It current lethality for groups is less than regular disease. So why hystreic measures?********
- that is awesome! with little hype about ventilators and packed icus seeing increases with little impact to major med issues