Politically Correct OTD

Out of context: Reply #154

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 329 Responses
  • drgs-2

    Author of "In Defense of Looting”, published in august.
    Vicky Osterweil, formerly William Osterweil.

    Tl;dr: Property is racism, because all property belongs to white people. Looting is good, because it combats racism and challenges class society, and the best entertainment for the masses is "controlled arson".

    Osterweil uses Korean store owners during the 1992 Los Angeles riots as an illustration of white cisgender male racism at the forefront of white suprematism.

    The most natural reaction to this book would be "if resisting robbery is racism, then I'm racist and I'm proud of it", but you can't say that in America, and so the Americans continue to marinate in their suppressed "racist" urges.

    All Trump has to do is to give a sign, and he will win by a landslide.
    And this is exactly what will happen

    Discuss

    drgs -2Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • So you're deadnaming people now? You silly fucking cunt.face_melter
    • I wish I would not have to address him at alldrgs
    • where do you get this shit? while it may be guff. as far as i could see there is nothing about gender in the book...kingsteven
    • you've formulated this post as an attack on her identity. deadnaming and then fabricating a narrative to justify it to yourself.kingsteven
    • So I dunno maybe if you're a reactionary cunt 'The most natural reaction to this book' would be attacking the gender identity of the author?kingsteven
    • Such is the state of political science today: if you are not black, transsexual or lesbian, your research is not interesting to anyone.drgs
    • There is exactly one minority in this world worth listening to: intelligent people. Everyone else (women, LBGT, black people, white suprematistsdrgs
    • cisgender, transgender etc) can arrange themselves in rows of 5 and and go fuck themselves.drgs
    • yeah, like... you know that no one on qbn ever would have heard of this shit if you didn't fucking post it???kingsteven
    • You're welcomedrgs
    • it's like when you see something trending on twitter, click on the hashtag and it's all people talking about the fact that the hash tag is trending...kingsteven
    • thats you right now. perpetuating a book spawned by a popular article posted on a platform where she is editor... something so niche it was self published...kingsteven
    • My source is Matt Taibbi, american gonzo journalist
      https://taibbi.subst…      drgs
    • and yet, having not read it you feel the need to have an opinion on it so fucking hard you just attack the author and fabricate shit thats not even in there...kingsteven
    • I judge books exclusively by their coversdrgs
    • and i dunno, to wiggle out of it. you then claim that intelligent people don't have identities or biases? do you ever entertain that you may the problem?kingsteven
    • so instead of sharing a well constructed takedown of the book that doesn't mention gender at all... you just dead name the author? because Trump?kingsteven
    • Intelligent people have identities, but they don't make it to be the content of all their workdrgs
    • At least read the synopsis:
      https://www.boldtype…      drgs
    • Not sure why you're stuck on gender? Nothing is mentioned about her gender below the picturedrgs
    • i read the original article, 2 articles about the book and her NPR interview and the matt taibbi article and i am saying you've made a dick of yourselfkingsteven
    • because the whole thing is so fucking cringe the bullshit would have spoken for itself if you hadn't insisted on attacking the author.kingsteven
    • No, the transgenderism is part of the wokeness starter pack, I had to emphasize that partdrgs
    • im not sure how she made her identity part of her work other than she's a fucking idiot rich kid that has never worked a day in her life...kingsteven
    • yeah, you emphasised you are the same level of reactionary stupidity that she is.kingsteven
    • Fight fire with fire!drgs
    • your whole post is "if trump did what i just did" - and you think that excuses the fact that you did it first?kingsteven
    • fighting a small fire by making it a big fire to stoke up a bigger fire to fight the fire, right.kingsteven
    • I don't describe what I want to see -- but what I see already is. America is a sick society with no prospect of resolving its tensionsdrgs
    • well, i see you...kingsteven
    • @kingsteven I heard about this in a podcast two weeks ago and the book is deeply flawed. It's the literary equivalent of a Vice headline - it has no value...Morning_star
    • ...other than to cause outrage. It's lazily written and logically ineptMorning_star
    • not defending the book, it looks like utter trash. im calling drgs out for being complicit in his own misery.kingsteven
    • Aren't we alldrgs
    • you make your own luckkingsteven
    • Dude the pearl clutching about dead-naming in these comments is rich.cannonball1978
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread