Trailer Of The Day

Out of context: Reply #2995

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 4,343 Responses
  • lemmy_k2

    Looks awful, and that's coming from the guy that likes Frankenhooker.

    • Frankenhooker is a great flick :Dkingsteven
    • what looks awful about it?utopian
    • this looks dope i must say_niko
    • Really diggin this, a different take done right, count me in for a magnet link.helloeatbreathedrive
    • Batman and Nirvana. What a time to be alive.Longcopylover
    • Doesn't look terrible but it's funny how they have to go "darker" with each film, to the point where in this one Batman is literally a goth who wears eyeliner.yuekit
    • It's meant to be heavy, this is Year One / Year Two Batman - basically an emotionally unstable bruiser with infinite wealth.face_melter
    • The bat logo on his chest is made from the guns that were used to shoot his parents.face_melter
    • If it's not Adam West, fuck off.CyBrainX
    • Well, I'm not a DC fan, but this doesn't look bad. And not nearly as embarrassing as what Clooney and Affleck did.Continuity
    • That George Clooney movie looked like one of the worst movies ever made.CyBrainX
    • It made the 1960s TV series look like The Dark Knight in tone and quality.Continuity
    • Looks a bit mediocre, compared to Nolans Batman... seems like they're going for the same vibe with a less talented director...jagara
    • God this shit is so corny. Why do they keep making thesescarabin
    • because of ben afflecksted
    • Because money.helloeatbreathedrive
    • Why not keep making them? Batman is perpetually remade, and has been for decades. Tons of stories to tell. It stays :)monospaced
    • this looks like a failcannonball1978

View thread