capitalism

Out of context: Reply #431

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 1,321 Responses
  • deathboy-4

    here you go utopian not that you will watch it. but im sure have some insult since all bark and no bite.

    some old school shit that has only proven itself correct over the last 40 years. also thought of this because my buddy mentioned so many companies struggling to hire while unemployment is up. IE Hamilton here. My theory is if you can get up to 600 a week, free mortgage, deferred utilities, and a stipend of 1200 why work? and curious if we might be going very big on serfdom now and curious who will be able to recover or become a drunk indian on a reservation with voting card. But gov bailouts of people or corps have little to do with capitalism...more second link.. if you care. you have your boogers you like to eat.

    and this is great as well, but more importantly the best is is towards the end in regards to inflation.

    maybe you can learn some fundamentals. a couple hours of debate and arguments across studio audience and hosts, and round table "phd's" groups not quite as fun as meme shit. but taking it old school helps show how far we have fallen and become a dingbat society. one which also can go back to the 80s and see postman predicted quite well. But culture and evolution outside economy theory and politics as they all come together for the big picture is a bit above your pay grade if you cant see a single nail. how do you do wink smiley face emoticons?

    • and on a side note. cause i like notes. how much would a person want to be paid per hour to give up 600 a week for no work?deathboy
    • i'm surprised to actually see you make a post, well done.kingsteven
    • I didn't watch either vid but this is a common and legitimate argument against universal income. But I wonder...monoboy
    • ...what you fell about those that use their money to make money. With no effort. Use wealth managers and tax havens.monoboy
    • Idle poor vs idle rich. Deserving poor and those that are undeserving? Not that simple is it.monoboy
    • If people can make a dignified living at any ability, and be respected for it, I think everyone would choose that.monoboy
    • What's more apparent than ever, is the current economic system protects the few that deserve it least.monoboy
    • It was crystallised in 2008, yet here we are again. And it'll probably continue in a race to the bottom.monoboy
    • Land owners, dodgy landlords, debt vultures, short selling hedge fund cunts and disaster capitalist need to go.monoboy
    • I bet they'll all make a killing out of COVID-19.monoboy
    • Okay Boomer...your savior and his early 20th century ideology of "trickle down economics" died along time ago with Reagan & Bush Sr...utopian
    • ...but I can't help but wonder why every last Republican President from Reagan to Trump have all lead the U.S. economy to recessions...Okay Boomer!utopian
    • Trickle-down theory is alive and well in Aus if you ask me, which no one did.MrT
    • Monoboy I don't care who makes passive capital work. Not entirely sure your point but seems to be picking on ppl u don't likedeathboy
    • Short sellers. Let them be but let them fail. They serve an interest but look more in movement of capital that allows it.deathboy
    • Rent vultures... Well if people don't invest in poor neighbhorhoods where will people live?. And look at the shit ton of rental rules that keep landlords from ideathboy
    • But I'd suggest really watching the videos to see how everything u hate is your gov regulations. Not capitalism. Poor rules creating bubblesdeathboy
    • Utopian thanks for showing how little u know. Friedman is of mises and hayek thinking and don't believe in trickle down policydeathboy
    • If u can state specifically a policy Friedman advocates for it's trickledown effects I'd love to see it.deathboy
    • And u know trickledown is far more Keynesian and fdr. It's gov spending and Central banking on money supply to promote growthdeathboy
    • But as Friedman always said it's stupid because such things only enrich fatcats. So it seems like we both dont like the same things. Just one of us that knows cdeathboy
    • The causes for such things. Not just being a sheep of pop culture political talk pointsdeathboy
    • And not o e comment to my question I. The notes or reason I stated why I posted video. Really wanted more thinking on behavior to new bailouts like welfare anddeathboy
    • Possible inflation of it. Will the new assets inflation make prices so high that it destroys middle-class in its entiretydeathboy
    • and utopians bark is very soft. almost soothing. like a single elderly deep woof. that just fades with the winddeathboy
    • its cute. thought maybe u'd have more teeth or tonedeathboy
    • You resort to insults often. You sound angry and a bit confused. Its almost as if defending the indefensible is taking its toll.monoboy
    • I understand (more or less) how capital works in western democracies, but its not sustainable if the majority don't have a pot to piss in.monoboy
    • One of my clients is an angel investment fund. They invest for positive reasons but also because its 'tax efficient'.monoboy
    • The system only works with equilibrium. The scales are fixed in favour of aggressive big capital.monoboy
    • And they get bailed out by taxpayers when it goes wrong. That's morally bankrupt if you believe in a true 'free market'.monoboy
    • Especially if it denies working people public services they've already paid for.monoboy
    • hmm i result to insults... if stating someone is wrong fro a multitude of reasons is an insult than sure. but no i dont partake much in play ground cut downdeathboy
    • contests. Angel investors invest for greater profit. That is #1. Afterall its called investment not giveaway charity for good intentions.deathboy
    • As far as tax goes depends on how its setup and why. Plenty of ways to setup of non profit investment arms to lower corporate profits.deathboy
    • as far equlilibrium a free market has more being its non centralized and everyone partakes individually day to day hour by hour in choice. it is a far moredeathboy
    • organic system than voting and passing laws and thinking federal banks and policy can do a better job. a terrible terrible ideadeathboy
    • and yes becuase i beleive in free amrkets i find the bailouts by taxpayers of failed business adventures terrible. always have and never said differentdeathboy
    • the 2 hours of pro capitalism videos might be worth watching. if you did i think u would see we both feel bailouts are bad. just one of is right in reaction anddeathboy
    • the other caused it and denial of it.deathboy
    • You’re operating under the assumption that if you quit your job you get that extra $600. Or that mortgage is not due. With both false you have nothing.monospaced
    • Government bailouts are definitely capitalist too. Just the socialist side of it. For socialist cunt rags like you. Enjoy your welfare you stupid fuck.monospaced
    • hahaha gov bailouts are capitalist?! Just the socialist side of it?! you just went full retarddeathboy

View thread