guns
guns
Out of context: Reply #78
- Started
- Last post
- 84 Responses
- deathboy0
and you know valentim I've never seen a study, more than likely beause no one to finance one with goals to any outcome related. but what percentage including suicide, gun fatalities happen under the influence of booze or another substance? a precursor to an event. If found say somehting liek 80% of gun related violence was under the influence of a substance how would you react. Still go after guns or go more for what seems like a root cause as others have done? think you are being puppeted by pop causes pal.
- why not look at it the other way around: if there were no guns around it wouldn't happen? same difference.renderedred
- Guns serve no purpose but to kill. Alcohol is enjoyed by billions without problems. It's really pretty stupid simple.formed
- There is only one purpose to guns. People kill people but guns makes it easier. You going around and around almost convincing yourself...valentim
- well render. if no guns magically didnt exist there would be no "gun" violence. You can outlaw them and still expect alrge amount of violence. Do people notdeathboy
- shoot heroin? It's a banned substance. And guns do not only kill.. really so juvenile of a statement. they protect. are police armed only to kill? they are alsodeathboy
- recreational. shit did you know there are olympic events with guns! youre just being maniuplated for control and politics pals.deathboy
- a gun is a tool like many man made things. hell probably does less damage than a cellphone culturally.deathboy
- and valentim the question still remains. if booze is a catalyst to using a thing like a gun do you go after booze or the gun. Think of DUI law and causesdeathboy
- @noteboy your argument is obsolete because heroin should be legal in my opinion. then what? more guns?renderedred
- @deathboy yes! police is armed to kill. anybody with a gun is supposed to be ok with killing someone no matter the reason.renderedred
- oitherwise why own one?renderedred
- 80% of gun owners i met were either total pussies or psychos. there's that...renderedred
- so, my logical conclusion was to NOT own a gun, not the opposite as you might suggest...renderedred
- RidÃculo.valentim
- render. you adovcate for heroin regardless the social harm addiction has. people do a lot of harm for a fix. available weapons can create problems.deathboy
- and you are cool with anyone owning a gun to kill for any reason?.. not sure you are even seeing any of the big picture here. you clearly support guns throughdeathboy
- claims it seems. but hey you got valentim riding your dick in hopes he doesnt need to answer a question.deathboy
- @deathboy your body is YOUR property. you wanna kill it with heroin? be my guest. very simple.renderedred
- what i said is different "anybody owning a gun should be ok with killing" otherwise why? for fun? as a sculpture?renderedred
- you don't use a gun to paint your house or drive a car :) guns are made to kill. sole purpose.renderedred
- blah blah blah...get a life, what question is that? Is you that seem to have all the answers, there is nothing I can really clarify to you!valentim
- render there is plenty of reasons again for owning a gun besides harming others. think olympics. not zero sum in your world viewdeathboy
- valnetim i dont have the answers you are looking for. merely hoping you see your own ignorance as well.deathboy
- but you may broaden your horizon on statistical data if available or even create new models in nature of gun violence and other relations to societydeathboy
- also render for fun what is the purpose of owning nukes? A product whos only use is to destroy humanity. multi use and value is quite subjectivedeathboy
- I know, no answers needed boy. Relax. Read. Share your ideas, make sure my ignorance ignorance knows what you talking about. But do read a bit.valentim
- you can start with Crowley, Roger. but this is not about: who has or is the bigger dick. Do you agree with guns?valentim
- i agree a gun is an object like a hammer and serves a purpose?.. i think some ppl have selective blinder sot the purpose base don differing cultural viewsdeathboy
- but it is an object and any value is based on the person using it. quite like a paintbrush.deathboy
- also think its a subject media has a hard on for because it triggers beliefs so they pump it harder and it self fulfills for clicksdeathboy
- now more people are migrating to cities. among many societies. i can see people growing up in large populated places in thinking guns only used to kill.deathboy
- and among the poorer ppl a gun being security + power in large cities. Those with scared of people without with guns is quite natural.deathboy
- but than you have rural communities or outside large cities and in the wild where man still deals with predators. and the wild open offers opportunities for recdeathboy
- open space you can easily leave city space have some beers and shoot targets. i have no idea why but ill say destruction is fundeathboy
- blowing up bottles disinetgrating objects...(wish trail markers didnt make such good targets)deathboy
- also chances of running into a cougar or bear might be higher than having house burn down but insurance for one is not questioned.deathboy
- there are absolutely tons of reasons to validate guns. before even going into the individual liberty aspects and legal issuesdeathboy
- and this is coming from a non gun owner. well i have 22 from a spanish maker that probably blow up on me my gramps took of a nazi.deathboy
- but as much as i can see the need for a gun for defense. I have the capital to avoid it. not all have that. Move to good ol similar cult econ suburbdeathboy
- But still its probably better and less expensive than an insurance policy to have as something you never use.deathboy
- Goddamn I forgot how terrible deathboy was with notes, this shit is definitely not missed.BuddhaHat