Pic of the Day
Pic of the Day
Out of context: Reply #115297
- Started
- Last post
- 129,684 Responses
- imbecile4
that body work...
via: 17-Year-Old Stanley Kubrick’s Photos Of 1940s New York Prove That He Was Born Genius
https://www.vintag.es/2011/12/st…- not the canon of a Vivian MaierBustySaintClaire
- that's solid proof right there, see!Projectile
- Yeah coolrobthelad
- Don't get me wrong, I fuggin' LOVE Stanley K and have watched all of his films like 25x - but to say born seems a bit over the top for these images. I love seetoemaas
- ing his development at this age - but you can see where he still hasn't his focus or shutter speed right yet. These are 24 of thousands - even he saidtoemaas
- "shoot hundreds" - handful of his best comps, but still technically (very) flawed.toemaas
- Isn't that the universal 'secret' to photography - 'take a shitload of pics and at least a handful will come out ok'?Nairn
- i think photography mustn't be crisp & perfect. I love these shots. they do have character & tell a good story. good times...helloeatbreathedrive
- I shot analog / medium format. I Don't think an image has to be sharp to be good. If so, Iphone X is the best photographer.tank02
- ^toemass, nonsense. I love that they aren't crisp and perfect. how boring the world would be if photography was that way.inteliboy
- As BustySaintClaire said - check out Vivian Maier and put it next to these -she knew what she was doing - not about crispness - it's about getting it right.toemaas
- yeah I love her work, and I love these shots of kubricks too.inteliboy