FUCK ADOBE!

Out of context: Reply #247

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 714 Responses
  • monNom0

    I get a gazillion emails from Adobe, always asking me to check out XD because it is so great and "professionals love it" . When, as far as I can tell it's still the same half-baked, do-nothing app it was during the beta. Am I missing something? You can draw boxes and make them clickable. Is this really the hallmark of innovation? This should be a palette inside illustrator, not a stand alone app.

    • It's a mixed bag, but I think XD is faster for a lot of things and has some potential. They add stuff to it at an alarming rate, which makes learning it harder.evilpeacock
    • XD can import artboards or arrayed content from PS, and from text files. Nothing else Adobe makes can do this as easily.evilpeacock
    • If nothing else you can use XD to import AI artboards, then export to AE quicker than it would usually take to batch AI to files, etc.evilpeacock
    • i'm using it, it's not that bad. has potential. the text tool is a piece of shitBluejam
    • I'm loving XD, it's light and super practical. They haven't ruined it with too many features yet!zarkonite
    • I'm liking it. takes some getting used to, though. It can get messy real fastGnash
    • They just added Guides...grafician
    • < exactly. That seems like a version 1 feature. It's all just a bit lacking. Like it was designed first for the ipad, and desktop was an afterthought.monNom
    • Buuuuut I'm not cobbling together user flows all day every day. Maybe it's good for this tasks.monNom
    • *thosemonNom

View thread