Shooting of the Day

Out of context: Reply #2338

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 2,851 Responses
  • ********
    -1

    by Brendon O'Connell
    (henrymakow.com)

    The guy was clearly trained. No if's, no buts. He was cool as a cucumber. He has done this before. The way he would reload - step back in the narrow hallway so there was less chance of being jumped as he reloaded.

    He is totally confident.

    The video is very disturbing, especially the young Muslim woman on the ground in front of the Mosque whimpering "Help me! Help me!" He blew the top of her head off.

    You do not handle an AR15, military-style semi-automatic assault rifle like that unless you have trained to clear jams and misfires in the efficient manner he displays. He darts back into cover, out of the expansive prayer hall into a narrow hallway to change magazines - this is not something you do naturally. This is military training. House clearing - to make it harder to be attacked while changing magazines.

    It is impossible to obtain an AR15 style assault rifle in Australia. Even a well connected organised crime figure would have trouble and you would immediately risk being on the "police radar" if you tried. So where did he train in their operation, tactics and handling? He was not long in New Zealand. He cannot buy firearms in New Zealand as an Australian citizen. Who brought them for him? Who supplied them? It is legal to own the AR15 he used and semi-automatic shotguns with the appropriate hunting licenses. Some claim his AR15 magazines were illegal 30 round.

    In the dock, he looks 5ft 4inches. Muscular. He looks special forces - small and powerful. How they like them. Traveled extensively. Especially in Europe. Claimed he was a simple working class lad - made his money investing in crypto, ie: he's a drug dealer. Absolutely he is. I knew a guy who worked security in Palestine when Arafat had casinos. He had no military training. He learned on the job. That's where I think that guy has come from. They claim he was in Pakistan, who knows. I just know what I saw in that video.

    He espouses a multitude of this-and-that politics claiming communist then anarchist, then libertarian and now he is not sure BUT he mentioned Mao and he draws from Julius Evola and "Sacred Tradition" which was Hitler's favourite book and Steve Bannon's too. Even though drawing from pure National Socialist water wells, the word "Jew" or "Jewish" never leaves his lips.

    He was playing Serbian Chetnik folk music at one stage which the Chechens would play as they fought the Croatian fascists.

    What a grab bag. I smell Bi Bi Henry. Who benefits? BiBi is about to make his own shooting video in Syria.

    Wag The Dog:
    "Change the story, change the lead, it's not a new concept."

    • Interesting and extraordinary claim. Now back it with evidence.wagshaft
    • ummm but it's an opinion piece. Something worthy of taking in to consideration, not something to be used in court.
      ********
    • Is the user base here so lacking in intelligence that I'm going to have to preface all my posts with...
      ********
    • "Attention dummies. I do not 100% believe everything I share, I'm simply sharing because it's something worth, at the very least, having a look at."
      ********
    • https://www.brainyqu…
      ********
    • Aristotle would have shat his pants in disappointment had he ever had to engage with the qbn user base
      ********
    • saying it's an extraordinary claim but doesn't seem to be backed up by any evidence is about the only response you can have in the short term, no?Fax_Benson
    • Well no, because it's the classic 'I'll forget this even entered my sphere of consciousness unless it's backed up with evidence'
      ********
    • Which frankly is not what QBN is about, at least for me anyway. This isn't a court of law, this is a discussion.
      ********
    • back what with evidence? is this not based on video evidence and personal experience already?monospaced
    • I find it fascinating that in the same link where this came from, the very next post is claiming the whole video is a fake computer simulationmonospaced
    • he's saying it's a fact. no ifs no buts. I'm not sure you wanted a discussion. I think you were waiting for a chance to point out how basic our thinking isFax_Benson
    • not everyone has your alt news background. People won't have been thinking about false flags. You just dropped it and waited for the first response to attackFax_Benson
    • set is just sharing someone else's opinion that he feel is worth consideringmonospaced
    • I didn't watch the video — I never will — but if this take on it is accurate, this "opinion" is worth considering.monospaced
    • @fax who's saying what's a fact????!!!!
      ********
    • Certainly not me, for even a second. I even, reluctantly was forced in to making a statement to ensure that people like you...
      ********
    • ... knew that I DIDN'T think this was fact simply because I shared it. I haven't engaged in any of this here for a long time, now I remember why.
      ********
    • Thank you for being the voice of reason, mono.
      ********
    • O'Connell is.Fax_Benson
    • Right, O'Connell is, not set. That's why he is opening it up for discussion, not presenting it as gospel.monospaced
    • Yeah, it's been a while - hope you've been OK. You did drop this out of nowhere and jump down the throat of the first person who commented.Fax_Benson
    • it's like you want us to disappoint you.Fax_Benson
    • The only thing o’connel Is presenting as fact is that the guy was trained. The rest seems pretty clearly offered as an opinion informed by his experience.Gnash
    • Before we get our undies in a twist... i think this guy is making claims without evidence. Typical conspiracy shit that becomes a broader narrative.wagshaft
    • Waste of breath. But Set, thank you for sharing! :)wagshaft
    • Interesting link...robotron3k
    • your kinda guyFax_Benson
    • @wagshaft, wouldn't you consider the video live stream itself evidence?monospaced

View thread