Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #30411
- Started
- Last post
- 33,769 Responses
- lowimpakt2
- High taxation isn’t inherently socialist, what you spend it is. Based on the years indicated I would guess they were buying lots of tanks and missiles.Gnash
- some of you act like temporarily embarrassed millionaires. stop complaining about a high marginal tax rate on the rich, it won't affect you!dorf
- Mostly recovering from WW2robotron3k
- Exactly to this graph. Taxing the rich didn't affect them at ALL and wouldn't today. With the correct budgeting process a shit ton of problems could be solvedcolin_s
- They weren't, they had wars to pay for. Currently AOC is saying lets raise taxes for the hell of it. A better idea would be to figure out where all the money iszarkonite
- going since the budget is $3.8trillion. I mean how the fuck can you not afford everything you want for that kind of money??zarkonite
- if you can choose to use tax to fight wars you can choose to use tax to look after your citizens health and economic security.lowimpakt
- not to mention that nobody actually paid those taxes with loopholes everywhere. And tax burden was split more even. Today 10% of people pays 90% of the taxes.Boz
- they need to kill all loopholes, set a flat tax for EVERYONE and you'll see how quickly when you have to give your own money people change their minds.Boz
- it's easy to be all righteous and moral when you are giving away other people's money.Boz
- this argument is 80 years old and nobody ever won it.Fax_Benson
- A flat tax rate is definitely the fairest solution.zarkonite
- until it isn'tFax_Benson
- discretionary spending of the budget is over 50% on the military so uh we could start therecolin_s
- The rich paying the majority of taxes is exactly the result you would expect in a world where the rich have almost all the money.yuekit