Brexit
Brexit
Out of context: Reply #857
- Started
- Last post
- 1,920 Responses
- PhanLo0
Already had a people's vote. Don't want a loser's vote.
- I love how for 2 years there's been talk of either no deal, canada++, norway+, switzerland, half in half out, single market only etc....shapesalad
- Essentially everyone suggesting an interpretation of 'brexit'. Then any mention of a 2nd ref to clarify that and Leave voters go into a hissy fit.shapesalad
- not insulting the people at all!!!
Don't think we can really trust sky for honesty though...mugwart - It's a mess. It's all such a mess.PhanLo
- no.trooperbill
- "the peoples vote" is a divide and conquor tactic. there will be one box for remain and multiple choices for leave to make sure remain wins.trooperbill
- Agree that's the tactic for some but it won't be signed off. It'll take two years to argue about what the question in a 2nd vote would beFax_Benson
- A second vote would require A50 to be extended, on which case everything is back on the table.Fax_Benson
- well they don't have to tick 'remain' at all, if they do and get the most votes, then that is it. Perhaps in 2016, one clear vision of leave would have avoidedshapesalad
- this mess. You've had people last week marching for brexit, leave means leave etc. yet.. what is that? you still need a plan. where is it?shapesalad
- guardian has the answer
https://pbs.twimg.co…Gnash - the original discussion w/ David Runciman was quite interestingFax_Benson
- ^ i'll look for itGnash