Politically Correct OTD

Out of context: Reply #51

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 329 Responses
  • Boz-6

    • did he speak to any men? why don't we see that? she agreed with him that men / women / everyone is different and only disagreed with his use ofFax_Benson
    • 'strong' because she didn't want to imply that women can't be physically strong. I don't know why she cried but probably has something to do with beingFax_Benson
    • targeted by a prick with a camera and an agenda.Fax_Benson
    • He did speak to men:
      https://www.qbn.com/…
      soundofreason
    • It is precisely because she considers strong an "bad word" that this belongs in the the Politically Correct OTD.soundofreason
    • I don't think she was "targeted" but I do he think he is a prick with a camera and an agenda.soundofreason
    • while he may have a point, she doesn't need to be shamed on youtube over her use of a word in an unplanned interview (unplanned by her)Fax_Benson
    • she didn't even say anything very silly. And he still needs a little end scene where he gets to play the victim, despite this being a massive power trip for himFax_Benson
    • you can point out the absurdity of extreme PC culture without being a cunt. Well, you should be able to. She is not the problem.Fax_Benson
    • He covers his tracks, so he can act like he's just a reasonable guy.soundofreason
    • Who we really should be looking at is the public that follows him. They're like the guys laughing too hard at racial jokes.soundofreason
    • indeed. it's all a distraction from the real issues at hand.fadein11
    • She is the Cathy Newman to his Jordan Peterson. She took the bait and made a fool of herself. Boz is the Proud Boy jerking off to the video.soundofreason
    • Did she though? She didn't say anything that bad, looked more lacking in confidence at being aware how the vid may be used than anything else.fadein11
    • https://youtu.be/312…
      That's when she made his point.
      I'm not saying I agree with his views. She got played because she accepted to play the game.
      soundofreason
    • @fadein11. What are the issues at hand?Morning_star
    • Her: "I'm questioning if there is another word"
      Him: "What's another good word for strong"?
      Her: "I don't know, that's what I'm proposing"
      soundofreason
    • We're talking about practice!
      Not the game. Not the game.
      We're tallking about practice!
      soundofreason
    • Fair enough, I've seen far worse examples of OC fanatics than her though, she looked drained before the convo even started, perhaps she had been up all nightfadein11
    • partying, or split from her boyfriend lol. Now she's prob gone viral, crazy.
      PC*
      fadein11
    • @morning, I can think of many more issues more important than trying to make young, naive people look stupid on Youtube. What does it prove?fadein11
    • For one thing it's indicative of a generation that is becoming so coddled it can't even acknowledge differences between genders. These types of subjects...Morning_star
    • ...are increasingly becoming categorised as taboo. As soon as the conversation becomes difficult or runs contrary to popular myth than its becomes an...Morning_star
    • ..oppressive or dismissive or a myriad other distracting reasons not to talk. Difficult conversations need to be had. If you can't defend your own beliefs...Morning_star
    • ...the you (one) should be unmasked for the sheep you are.Morning_star
    • This didn't come across as difficult though, I just don't think she was in the right frame of mind to chat, hence why she cried. She didn't cry at anything saidfadein11
    • *...myth then it's...Morning_star
    • I must move in very different circles as the young people I know through work wouldn't bat an eyelid at these discussions. It does seem to be more of a US issuefadein11
    • Agreed.Morning_star
    • The type of conversations those types of video are not at all DIFFICULT, they are actually very PETTY. It's not hard to read between the lines.soundofreason
    • he set her up and then milked it on his youtube channel.Nothing 'difficult' or challenging about it. He didn't want a conversation. He wanted an easy 'win'Fax_Benson
    • @soundofreason What do take from reading between the lines?Morning_star
    • @fax Why was it so difficult for the girl to admit that men are physically stronger?Morning_star
    • @Morning_star
      That lizard people are using PC culture to emasculate us and take our women as sex slaves for future earth domination.
      # wake up sheeple
      soundofreason
    • fuck knows. I'd guess because she didn't want to imply that women can't be physically strong too. Why does he need to do that to her to make his point?Fax_Benson
    • creepy, unnecessary and plays up to the misogynists who hang out in youtube comments who like to see girls get taken down in the name of 'common sense'Fax_Benson
    • Are girls not able to reason and argue effectively?Morning_star
    • @soundofreason. ahhh, the Ike gambit.Morning_star
    • yes, obviously. And no doubt all the better when as prepared to do so as the guy planning the impromptu 'debate' .Fax_Benson
    • No. It was nothing to do with unpreparedness. Besides, I thought you said it wasn't a difficult subject.Morning_star
    • of course it was.Fax_Benson
    • How prepared do you need to be to answer that easy question ?Morning_star
    • just went on his channel and browsed old videos. The guy's a fame whore and a complete tool._niko

View thread