Intellectual Dark Web
Intellectual Dark Web
Out of context: Reply #44
- Started
- Last post
- 199 Responses
- Morning_star-3
i_monk
This video should add a little more illumination to what he thinks about the subject. It pretty much provides explanation and further insight to all the points you made below.
Could you explain the perception you have about an agenda, and what you think it is? I'm curious.
- He's an edgelord with tenure. That's about it.garbage
- ‘Edgelord’ ? Can provide one iota of evidence for your claim?Morning_star
- Again, what does raising kids have to do with two men or two women wanting to marry? They don't hand you a baby when you exchange rings.i_monk
- And why does he ignore the role of the extended family? That is a much older "traditional mode of being" than the model he holds up as a template.i_monk
- This is one of his Q&A sessions. They're all available on his you tube channel. He was asked "What are your thoughts on gay people raising children" which i...Morning_star
- ...am certain is the reason he talks about same sex marriage. I'd imagine the reason why he doesn't talk about extended family is because he has limited time...Morning_star
- ...and a lot of questions to get through. Why are you so hell bent on trying to explain his opinions as dangerous or sinister or manipulative. I don't get it.Morning_star
- He uses raising kids as a reason gays shouldn't be allowed to marry, demonstrating his agenda quite clearly.i_monk
- Whenever his position on gay marriage is pointing out, one of his followers tries to pivot the discussion to raising kids.i_monk
- Being married ≠ having kids. Having kids ≠ being married.i_monk
- It's an excuse to justify inequality.i_monk