UFO of the day
UFO of the day
Out of context: Reply #457
- Started 14 years ago
- Last post 6 days ago
- 1,090 Responses
- Muncher0
It makes a little sad that to this day there is still not a single credible piece of evidence for UFOs.Even in today's camera-saturated world we still have no seen a single piece of compelling evidence.
And I really WANT to believe.
*G.P-C.
- Today's missing word= 'Me'. It makes ME a little sad.Muncher
- same. though last time I said this here I was told of my cognitive dissonance or some nonsense.inteliboy
- yupmonospaced
- Plenty of compelling evidence. Radar data. Airline pilot sightings. Belgium 'flap' , Pheonix lights etc. Etc. etc. Shit loads of evidence. Dig deep.fadein11
- Not saying it's aliens though :)fadein11
- And excuse all the etc's. Typing on my phonefadein11
- I love a good Belgian flap I do. I guess I didn't mean 'evidence' so much as 'undeniable evidence', and there's so much thats obviously stuff mistaken or faked.Muncher
- we talk about modern tech but truth be told camera phones are shit. The sensors are so-so, lens tiny bits of plastic, no zoom features then heavy ...mugwart
- ... codec compression of something that is far away. Then operated by an ametrue in shock/adrenaline - uploaded to youtube - with more compressionmugwart
- the normal person wont walk around with an arri film camera with a telephoto lens.mugwart
- while most are fake, I work with VFX I can see the 'signs' but I have also seen things in the sky - the time you reach your camera its gone or you realise itmugwart
- will look like shit. There is also the shame factor attached.mugwart
- Even if they did they wouldn't film anything because UFOs aren't real. See also: All gods, Rods, Lochness Monster and a new Tool album.Morning_star
- @muncher lol. I know what you mean. There isn't undeniable proof but after becoming a little obsessed with the subject for a while (from a sceptics stance) Ifadein11
- fuzzy footage is what keeps the whole thing on the road.Fax_Benson
- came out the other end pretty certain there is more to it than the mainstream narrative. It's an interesting subject to follow. A lot of nuts of course but alsofadein11
- a lot of v.reasonable people who have lost/risked a lot to tell their stories.fadein11
- But not saying it is aliens :)fadein11
- but aliens!
I also got a bit obsessed. There is something happening - just not the latest tool album ;-(mugwart - Wait.. what? I thought morning_star was a known religionist here?? 'All gods'?detritus
- I do agree that it's a fascinating subject. For instance, knowing little about the Stan Romanek case, i watched the Netflix doc. Seemed pretty compelling until.Morning_star
- ...you 'dig deep' and realise the extent of the contrary evidence and explanation omitted from the doc. Most cases are like that.Morning_star
- Whoah there Detritus... 'known religionist'? I'm about as anti religion as you can get. As for 'gods', i'm agnostic about a 'higher intelligence'.Morning_star
- but the Stan Romanek case was always shit in my eyes. It stank of fakeness the 1st moment I came across it. I someone is selling DVD's of their story it'sfadein11
- pretty certainly not worth following.fadein11
- It was an odd circumstance as I came to the case through the Doc. Plenty of alarm bells rang and decided to explore the truth of it. It was pretty obv that ...Morning_star
- 'pretty certainly'... oops. you know what I meant.fadein11
- that Stan Romanek documentary on Netflix is an absolute joke, start to finish ... not a single piece of his story or footage is even remotely convincingmonospaced
- ...it was horse-shit after a few mins of research. however, lots of people don't 'dig deep' and believe at face value. What do think the most compelling
case?Morning_star - I'd go so far as to say that, at BEST, it sounds and looks like an average age teenager created and wrote that nonsense.monospaced
- wtf? I'm very sorry monring_star - I thought you were fairly ardently Christian? How on Earth have I got that mixed up?! I know we've both been on the same...detritus
- ...'side' of 'debates' on here about potential dangers in waning belief systems, but I thought we came from different sides?
I'm seriously confused now.detritus - @morning_star. There's an English guy who has written volumes (I think there are about 3 books) of straight up statements from Police officers in the UK whofadein11
- witnessed stuff. An obscene amount of data. He's an ex police officer who witnessed something and now encourages ex-police officers to come forward. Some offadein11
- those are v.interesting. And the Japanese airline pilot whos sighting was backed up by radar data. Countless Pheonix lights witnesses. Rendelsham Forest. Sofadein11
- many to list. I always tend to find the ones where people have lost a lot to tell the story the most convincing. If I have some time I will post a list offadein11
- the ones I find convincing. But as someone said still no undeniable proof.
I would say Out of the Blue is the best doc on the subject and I know What I Sawfadein11 - both on Netflix.fadein11
- https://www.youtube.…fadein11
- @ Detritus. No need to apologise. My interest in 'spirituality and consciousness' is complex. Some could get that mixed up with support for religions.Morning_star
- @ fadein11. Thanks for those recommendations. I'll add them to my watch list. Rendelsham is dead interesting. Have you heard about the chap that was found...Morning_star
- ...dead on top of a pile of gravel in Yorkshire . Super spooky.Morning_star
- no please tell me more.fadein11
- ah the last bit hadn't appeared when I commented - I will have a lookfadein11
- Cannot find - do you have a link?fadein11
- Zigmund Adamski - http://www.bbc.co.uk…Morning_star
- thanks. another Adamski!fadein11
- Killer, isn't it ;)Morning_star
- v. interesting for sure. Never come across this even though I was aware of that area being a hotspot.fadein11