Pic of the Day

Out of context: Reply #105947

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 131,428 Responses
  • imbecile0

    • I'd be pissed if that was my sculpture of the bullGnash
    • why?monospaced
    • the juxtapositioning of the girl into the scene changes the artist dynamic and disrespects the artists vision.Gnash
    • especially by some fucking investment bank and their bloated ad agencyGnash
    • it distorts and mutilates the integrity of the sculptureGnash
    • they should make their pedantic little statement without ass fucking someone else's workGnash
    • lol, the bull wasn't invited either.imbecile
    • gnash, your shit fuck attitude regarding this is exactly why the girl should stayimbecile
    • pfft his opinion has nothing to do with standing for or against what the girl represents.cannonball1978
    • fist yourselfGnash
    • If you know the background story behind the bull, the girl makes no sense whatsoever.derdennis
    • what derdennis saidmonospaced
    • To me, there's nothing about the bull that needs to be confronted, since all it represents is a strong market/economy, which is a positive thing.monospaced
    • Placing the girl there like she's somehow standing up against that seems like a misguided attempt to turn a financial symbol into a sexual one.monospaced
    • It's pandering, and the girl statue was put there by a bank anyway.monospaced
    • lol at monspaced bringing the word sexual into this conversation regarding a bronze statue of a clothed child.imbecile
    • agreed, mono, it is also weak conceptuallyGnash
    • but but but female empowerment imagery, mo matter what makes sense.cannonball1978
    • lol @ imbecile not realizing that this is interpreted as a male/female dichotomy, and in his confusion, attempting and failing miserably to attack memonospaced
    • at no point was there an attack. only a comment on your sexual observation, but party on wayneimbecile

View thread