Politics

Out of context: Reply #20977

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,773 Responses
  • ********
    -13

    This is the type of behavior Hillary wants to support. Hillary thinks killing babies is morally right. You don't have to be religious to see that this type of behavior is wrong. They call it pro-choice, but it hides the idea that its pro-murder. I know there are circumstances that may condone such actions, but the other 99% of women should better consider adoption instead. People want to call it punishment to not allow this. It's hard to suggest that I think tax dollars would be well spent to support this as it's more of a personal choice. There are tons of available parents without kids these days. This is sad.


    This was the most civilized photo, but the reality of abortion are too horrifying.

    Warning (graphic reality):
    https://www.google.com/search?q=…

    ********
    -13Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • What surprises me is the many soulless down votes that willfully support this. Elections aside, do you really think this is the right thing for young girls?
      ********
    • let me guess your stance on an incest or rape pregnancy..BonSeff
    • yesFax_Benson
    • ..if that's what THEY decide is best in the circumstances.Fax_Benson
    • Yes, there's the forgivable 1% for victims of rape and related incidences. But many see abortions as responsible contraceptive next to condoms and lube.
      ********
    • the woman's choice begins at sex. Do you choose to have sex? yes. are you responsible and old enough to have sex? yes.
      ********
    • woman's choice shouldn't begin with the violent act of killing babies. we don't handle responsibility with killing the young.
      ********
    • abortions up there with breast implants and plastic surgery. things that make you feel and look better.
      ********
    • the choice should begin and end with her - not you.Fax_Benson
    • especially not youFax_Benson
    • I'd rather spend ten times more of my tax dollars by giving life a chance. Instead of smashing the skull of a human baby for $400
      ********
    • not when it concerns tax dollars.
      ********
    • breast implants are also a woman's choice, but why should people pay for that?
      ********
    • i'm still up for woman's choice, but I don't want to condone death with tax dollars.
      ********
    • what a conundrumFax_Benson
    • and what about the father. Shouldn't he have anything to say?
      ********
    • I think it's more of the immediate family's choice. mom and dad.
      ********
    • and unfortunately the baby doesn't have a choice if anyone is concerned with human rights.
      ********
    • “Perhaps there is no greater miracle than finding a loving home for a child who needs one.” – President Bill Clinton
      ********
    • ohhh omgRamanisky2
    • Steve Jobs: ‘I’m glad I didn’t end up as an abortion’
      ********
    • ohh omgRamanisky2
    • Nice how you make women soley responsible for the choice to have sex. Nobody cares what you're up for. It's not about you.monkeyshine
    • Everyone is responsible for their own bodies, and it takes a male/female to make a baby. However its your body, so no means no, or yes means yes.
      ********
    • the choice to have sex is dependent on each other. Obviously if you are not part of that circle, it's none of your business.
      ********
    • You must love the GOP then, since they have been making it harder for women to get abortions.reanimate
    • Clinton, Stein and Johnson all support right to choosereanimate
    • The reality of unwanted, abused and starving child's is far worse than any photo you can find regarding abortion. Solve that, then come back to the table.formed
    • The question is whether to keep the baby or not, but not resort to killing it.
      ********
    • reanimate, I believe in the right to choose. There are two choices, and i have made one. That is called the right to choose.
      ********
    • When its my turn to have a kid, I will choose to keep it, rather than kill it.
      ********
    • What if that baby would kill your wife if she held it to term? Would you allow an abortion then if it saved her life?monospaced
    • What if your daughter was responsible, had birth control and still got pregnant? It happens. Would you force her to keep it instead of going to college?monospaced
    • formed, so you think that if a child is unwanted, abused or is hungry, that they were better off dead? Rather than giving it a home, food, or trusting parents?
      ********
    • It's this mentality that we can simply get rid of responsibilities by killing off who we think is wrong. In this case, its the baby.
      ********
    • mono, if there are health issues such as the baby being disfigured, sick, or causing sickness to the mother then it becomes necessary to save lives in that case
      ********
    • meaning abortion is required and not used to fend off responsibility.
      ********
    • If my daughter got pregnant, I would be a grandfather and hopefully I would be very joyous. Usually that is the case.
      ********
    • but again I wouldn't condone killing to fend off responsibility. There's nothing wrong in taking off a semester or two before or during college.
      ********
    • "They call it pro-choice, but it hides the idea that its pro-murder."
      "I believe in the right to choose"      reanimate
    • You are either not that bright, or trolling.reanimate
    • reanimate. Pro-choice is a contradictory word as it condones a right to choose, but insinuates that you're okay with abortion, which is not true in all cases.
      ********
    • You can condone a right to choose, but also not be in favor of abortion.
      ********
    • There is a third option that you're just not seeing.
      ********
    • Actually many people don't see it, and they think that abortion is just another method of contraception, and an easy way out of responsibility.
      ********
    • So the next time someone tells you that they're pro-choice. Ask them if they're on the side of murder or life as their right of choice.
      ********
    • Which are you? The side of murder or life?
      ********
    • You are talking flippantly about a serious issue that a lot of women grapple with.reanimate
    • It's easy to get outraged over pictures of fetuses that look like babies, but is abortion one month after pregnancy murder? Is birth control murder?reanimate
    • Where do you draw the line? If you really think it's murder, than logically you should be in favor of banning it.reanimate
    • If you take this murder argument to its natural conclusion, then every time you rub one out you are committing genocide.reanimate
    • people seem to think that abortion only affects women, but its an issue for parents, and that requires both man and woman. and yes respectful is important.
      ********
    • the 3rd week after conception marks the beginning of the embryonic period when the brain, heart and organs form.
      ********
    • So you think abortion is OK second week but fourth week is murder?yuekit
    • Seems kind of random and arbitrary. But in terms of law, pretty much any Democrat would say the same thing -- should be legal but as rare as possible.yuekit
    • One of the ways to reduce abortion would be to expand access to birth control including morning after pill... which conservatives oppose.yuekit
    • what century is it?fadein11
    • ohhhhh omgRamanisky2
    • yuekit, i just don't think abortion should be the quick solution for lack of contraceptives or a convenience tool, which many young adults are turning to.
      ********
    • but there are areas where we turn to abortions for instance health regarding mom and child, and rape victims.
      ********
    • we'll end up having to define appropriate times that abortions become inhumane.
      ********
    • in the timeline when the baby goes from embryo to fetus. its a big gray area of unknowns.
      ********
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread