Show some recent work
Show some recent work
Out of context: Reply #6836
- Started
- Last post
- 8,592 Responses
- Hayoth11
- Niceset
- I'm not going to say I don't like it.detritus
- I have to say that I like this very much!sureshot
- sweetsince1979
- This pleases meProjectile
- I like it very much but there's something with the MILLER letters that somehow distracts me. Looks like you used 3 different types. I like the colors as well.oey
- i like Miller, i think 'Glassworks' is their best album yetBennn
- oey I don't think that's a fontmonospaced
- I like the illustration even if it makes little anatomical sense ;) I wish there was a stronger relationship between the mark and type too. Company is real?monospaced
- Two fonts. Miller is a little too display. I agree.Hayoth
- I actually feel like Miller could go MORE display. Some of that bird in it. Some thin parallel lines worked in among the thick, etcmonospaced
- Colour-wise, my only beef with this is the grey in the gradient, over the R on the first line, and K/S on the second. Just feels a touch muddy.Continuity
- Beautiful. I agree with continutity i wish the purple came in sooner and more pronounced.HijoDMaite
- Somehow brighter or purer. A nice rich royal purple.Continuity
- If we're being pedantic I think glassworks should be smaller (width wise) than millerset
- oi mono, I know. I just mean somehow it looks like. and I also agree with continuity. and a bit smaller as well the glassworks or maybe that's not so important.oey
- CHANGE THE BIRD FOR A DILDOdetritus
- The styled font is baron new and secondary is raleway.Hayoth
- In a world of overly simplified mastercard logos, I like this. Nice work.DRIFTMONKEY