Wireless Headphones?

Out of context: Reply #3

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 6 Responses
  • uan0

    why wireless? fuck that. needs batteries and shit.
    anyway...how about the marshalls? they look rock / metall

    Marshall Major II Bluetooth

    • < exactly, they only last a couple of hours and bluetooth isn't exactly known as passing on anything considered quality audiomonospaced
    • um... what? most wireless headphones charge via bluetooth now. No batteries.kona
    • I have a pair of in-ear Jay Bird Storm X2 that were $143. They fit great and are comfortable. However, I don't think I could wear them all day.kona
    • I also have a pair of Beats Studio noise-cancelling wireless headphones. The sound is great but they're... Beats. The price point is higher than what u want.kona
    • If I had a do-over I would get a set of Audio Technica. http://www.abt.com/p…kona
    • argh. edit. Most headphones charge via USB now.kona
    • When something charges by USB, what do you think they are charging?
      Batteries die. Viva la cords.
      jasontroj
    • 'needs batteries and shit' implied AA or AAA batteries. not internal polymer type. you don't need to purchase batteries for most wireless headphones.kona
    • ewwwwwww
      ********
    • still need to charge them...aka sometimes they don't workuan
    • Never buy headphones that aren't german or made by companies that know jack shit about headphones like MarshallWeyland

View thread