RIP Justice Scalia
RIP Justice Scalia
Out of context: Reply #8
- Started
- Last post
- 17 Responses
- iCanHazQBN1
- typical right wing nututopian
- Scientific evidence is less compelling than religious faith is basically the gist of that. Sounds like something ISIS would say.monoboy
- I an ideal world believing this would disqualify him from being a judge in the first place.monospaced
- monospaced turns a blind eye again.yurimon
- not in the slightest, yurimon, both eyes wide open, neither being averted heremonospaced
- someone with this much extreme biases and myth-based ideas of good and evil should never be a judgemonospaced
- but of course you would support him, because you are a creationistmonospaced
- he was a consistent judge mono. i dont believe this, I dont see it in his decision regardless of propaganda.yurimon
- there 2 event used to classify him on of which is affirmative action which is used to label him a racist. was he? I dont know.yurimon
- His stance as I understand it is that higher education or universities shouldnt lower standards to admit based on race or gender. can these ideas be used toyurimon
- discriminate? of course. so can ideas about diversity exclude people and be indiscriminately applied? yup, but its somehow is wrapped in feel good feelings.yurimon
- the beef is that society is leaning away from merit based on achievement to trying to collectivize accomplishment amongst everyone regardless.yurimon
- Pretty spot on. If you were honest you'd say "i have no idea how creation started."Hayoth
- Affirmative action... https://youtu.be/SwX…monoboy
- I'm always amazed when yuri has a really coherent day and I can make perfect sense of what he writes. Good points.monospaced
- Yuri, he was a consistent judge??? He said he was all for the states rights, and then became a hypocrite when Florida wanted to handle the voting debacleiCanHazQBN
- during Bush vs Gore. Turns out you don't know your history after all.iCanHazQBN
- I'm not scalia, but for the most part. alot of issues and angles regarding that case so you are correct along those lines as a consideration.yurimon