blog
blog
Out of context: Reply #62187
- Started
- Last post
- 76,752 Responses
- chukkaphob4
666+666+666+(6+6+6)=2016
- those parenthesis do absolutely nothing********
- they absolutely visually communicate the grouping into a 6 6 6, the mark of the beastchukkaphob
- Do you even math bro********
- it can't end with "+18", do you even numerology?Gnash
- No I don't, the plus sign in front of the parenthesis isn't distributive so it's redundant and stupid, pretty sure the point would be made without them********
- stupid like the Lord of Flies, you mean!!
(besides, if the plus sign wasn't in front wouldn't it be x18 not +18 ?)Gnash - Hey, Turd Burglar! https://45.media.tum…chukkaphob
- Yes, @Gnash. You are correct.chukkaphob
- Oh wow these notes are fun! :Dpango
- Lol gnash, are you joking********
- The parenthesis aren't in any way needed********
- 666+666+666+6+6+6=20... is what it should be gnash, it would be shocking if you trully are confused on this, hope your just having a giggle********
- Wow someone cares way too much lolpango
- {[1998]+(6+6+6)}********
- LOLsea_sea
- but turdburgler, you said the plus sign wasn't needed, not the parenthesis. so it would by x(18) in that case. take out the brackets and you're correct.Gnash
- but Beelzebub won't be as pleasedGnash
- Obviously not what I said gnash, watch out with playing dumb, your face could get stuck like that********
- Let's all relax and count this out using our fingers.futurefood
- to quote: "the plus sign in front of the parenthesis isn't distributive so it's redundant and stupid"
just saying.Gnash - The parenthesis are redundant and stupid because the addition isn't distributive. C'mon now, you understand basic algebra don't you********
- Please let this go to 200+ notes! Please let this go to 200+ notes!pango
- Make it happen blondie, you and gnash. I'm outta here, 1********
- I do get what you're saying and you're right now. BUT you said the plus sign was stupid and redundant, NOT the parenthesis. and that was incorrect.Gnash
- AND, most importantly, the Father of Lies will be disappoint, son.Gnash
- @pango -- can't go to 200, I don't know that many alt names for the devil. I have maybe 10 more, tops.Gnash
- The return of gilgamush!!!!! :Dpango
- @turdburglar, you've reached troll level 666. Congrats!chukkaphob
- Why does he keep coming back to get pissed off?pango
- it was a friendly exchange -- no one's angryGnash
- sure if you say so.pango
- why did this stop at 23 notes?chukkaphob
- Because 2/3=0.666666...pango
- LOL @pango!!!chukkaphob
- lolGnash
- those parenthesis do absolutely nothing