religion

Out of context: Reply #1606

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 3,482 Responses
  • atomholc0

    • oh my god. i thought the farmer was photoshopped in.iCanHazQBN
    • It's not haute couture, it's hate couture ...atomholc
    • hows is it different from you hating the haters?yurimon
    • You're hopeless. Go move to a primitive tribe in the third world.iCanHazQBN
    • Hitler hated the jews... does that mean we can't hate the hater (Hitler)?iCanHazQBN
    • There is a wrong and right, whether you're sensitive to it or not. The ones denying the rights of others are in the wrong.iCanHazQBN
    • you simpletons never get tired of invoking hitler in every convo. big fucking yawn. intellectual midget, us vs. them shit
      ********
    • So icanthaz, how much dependence on government do you need to have in order to be progressive? 0-100% pick a number.yurimon
    • How can you disagree with the basic premise that all people living in a civilized country should have equal rights?iCanHazQBN
    • If this was 70 years ago, you would be the same people pulling excuse after excuse out of your asses for why blacks shouldn't have equal rights.iCanHazQBN
    • You will say anything to justify your backward views.iCanHazQBN
    • Show me what document grants you the right to marry. You haven't the slightest clue what rights are or what you are blathering about
      ********
    • And yes, pull the race card out of nowhere some more why don't you. You are soft in the brain
      ********
    • You're playing semantics. We all know what's implied by "right" as it applies to getting married and it being LEGAL and being officially recognizediCanHazQBN
    • by one's government... and the benefits that come with being married that should be available for ALL.iCanHazQBN
    • Right in the sense we are using it simply means you are legally entitled to do something.yuekit
    • There are all kinds of references to rights in the legal code including when it comes to marriage. Learn basic English before you accuse people of being dumb.yuekit
    • And gilgamush, I wasn't pulling "the race card". I was pulling the equal rights card. The blacks are just one group of people that have been discrimated againstiCanHazQBN
    • by people with your mindset, decades ago. Before that, it was women. Now it's gays. You're on the wrong side of history.iCanHazQBN
    • That's nice. Show me what document legally entitles you to marriage or you are both dumb
      ********
    • You will go to your granddaughter's lesbian wedding in 30 years and think in your head "gosh i hope nobody saw those messages i left on qbn long ago."iCanHazQBN
    • lol, 30 years. you invoke hitlers image, call people racists, and now insinuate that i am a homophobe. you sir are a clown. show me the document that grants you
      ********
    • the right to marriage you dumb fuck. it is very simple
      ********
    • for all you know i am a gay black woman so cut the shit and argue the point or shut your stupid ass up
      ********
    • Plenty of government laws dealing with marriage. Not sure what point you are trying to make.yuekit
    • show me this 'government law' that grants you marriage as a right. oh that's right, you can't, because it doesn't exist. you guys wanna defame people and misuse
      ********
    • legal terms and redefine them relative to your social agenda but can't argue the mother fucking point for a single second
      ********
    • lol, government issues licenses that grant people legal rights for being married. There are plenty of laws covering this.yuekit
    • Stop pretending you are some kind of legal scholar.yuekit
    • is that the best you can do. we are talking about the right to marry not the legal privileges marriage grants. once again you don't know what the word means
      ********
    • lol, gov cant grant rights. your rights come from god. they can give you privileges, or violate your rights.yurimon
    • That's how the right to marry exists in the legal code. You go to an office and get a license which says you are married.yuekit
    • The whole point of the Supreme Court decision was that as long as government issues marriage licenses for some people, it can't deny them to others.yuekit
    • You seem to think it matters that there isn't a piece of paper somewhere saying "YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO MARRY." It doesn't.yuekit
    • well that would be the official stance on paper at least
      ********
    • If you want to pursue crackpot legal theories like that, take it up with the U.S. legal system. Which doesn't take your view seriously.yuekit
    • dude, you are very misinformed. go read something bro, you are sounding like an ignoramus
      ********
    • lol, I'm not the one arguing a ridiculous view of things that has no basis in actual law.yuekit
    • But yes, the nature of inalienable rights have been distorted in this case. Marriage is a side show
      ********
    • Instead of calling people stupid, why don't you explain how your theory has any relevance to the real world or how the legal system currently treats marriage.yuekit
    • marriage is a religious institution, civil law is wrong in appropriating it. the controversy lately doesn't address this because the topic is a sideshow
      ********
    • The reality is that in modern day society it's a civil institution. You don't have to be religious to get married, and that's not going to change anytime soon.yuekit
    • yuekit you are basically justifying and praising your enslavement haha!yurimon
    • inbred religious nuts!organicgrid

View thread