religion
religion
Out of context: Reply #1604
- Started
- Last post
- 3,482 Responses
- ********1
- What a moron. Have your religious beliefs fine, but there's something called Separation of Church and State. And she's clearly in violation of the current laws.iCanHazQBN
- What a dumb cunt. Probably thinks she's a bigshot martyr now.iCanHazQBN
- If you're denying equal rights to a specific group of people, you'll always be on the wrong side of history.iCanHazQBN
- I wonder how many white shop owners in the 1950's said "I don't want blacks in my shop because it's against my religious beliefs".iCanHazQBN
- Free At Lastutopian
- "IT'S AGAINST MY RELIGIOUS BELIEFS TO PAY FOR THIS FERRARI! STOP VIOLATING MY RELIGIOUS BELIEFSiCanHazQBN
- EVEN THOUGH IT'S ILLEGAL TO TAKE THIS CAR WITHOUT PAYING FOR IT! ALL PRAISE BOB, THE FREE-CAR GOD!"iCanHazQBN
- the irony is that both sides of the argument are just 2 sides of the same sheople.yurimon
- What is "sheople" about allowing the same rights for everyone??? Get a clue. The religious have been, and will always be, against progress.iCanHazQBN
- licensed anything is not a right. look it up. how is marriage progressive again?yurimon
- It's not about marriage itself. It's about equal rights, no matter what it is. You can't give SOME people rights, and then withhold those rights from others.iCanHazQBN
- I personally don't even agree with marriage, it's not for me, and I find it stupid. The point is the RIGHT to do something should be equal for all.iCanHazQBN
- Marriage is not progressive. Giving people equal rights is. Women being allowed to vote, blacks being allowed to vote, etc.. That is progress.iCanHazQBN
- I can't believe I just had to explain that. Why would it be worth having a debate with you if that's something that I need to explain to you???iCanHazQBN
- Excuse me, where can I get in on this Free Ferrari religion?********
- you are pleading the state for a privilege, ei, license. how is it ever an equal right to get a license?yurimon
- license,yurimon
- The permission granted by competent authority to exercise a certain privilege that, without such authorization, would constitute an illegal act, a Trespassyurimon
- I'd just form a society, like the amish have where you have a system of taking care of each other, more freer, then licensing schemes. more progressive. to meyurimon
- Dear yurimon, please go form your own society.********
- its just misinformed of what licensing is legally and what progressive freedom is.yurimon
- Let's all just take a moment to appreciate that yurimon just called amish society "more progressive" than regular society.********
- Hey yurimon, how about this idea: Everyone in the U.S. can get married except you. Fair?iCanHazQBN
- 6 seconds... thats all I could get through.Al_dizzle
- your an idiot nb, im referring to the amish of community that formed a society around their beliefs without state interference.yurimon
- i'm fine with it but its like 2 side of ignorant people here. one is the progressive religion and the other is fake Christianity. its like a stupid sandwich.yurimon
- yuri, you just slam dunked that shit bro********
- Yep, slam dunk, yuri! Now go start your own society!********
- You make a decent amount of noise and rarely say anything nb. This kid is presenting ideas efficiently and you still cut him down********
- And Iol @ icanhaz talking about human rights as he sees them as interchangeable with legal rights. They are very different pal, social agendas aside********
- Yurimon
adjective
1. A word used to describe someone that thinks they're smarter than average...when in fact they're dopey as dog shit.
"He's done a Yurimon"BusterBoy - So go live with the amish you think that is such a superior system. I'm sure you'll be doing that any day now lolyuekit
- In the meantime, there's no good argument to make for depriving one group of people from the same rights as everyone else.yuekit
- yuekit, you crazy? they have their own society and dont petition or plead to the government, and have their own community self sufficient. whats wrong with thatyurimon
- tell me whos progressive? begging the gov or independent community who is self sufficient? not talking about the details of what they choose to follow.yurimon
- It's completely irrelevant because no one involved in this story is amish or wants to live like that. This Kim Davis woman isn't advocating for live and letyuekit
- live, she wants to get paid with taxpayer money and then decide based on her religion who gets the right to be married.yuekit
- yukit, marriage isn't a right. another example of the bureaucracy overstepping it's responsibility. marriage is a religious institution********
- It is a right though. If you think it should only be religious then that is your opinion, but not the way it works today.yuekit
- you aren't entitled marriage, it isn't a right. relative ethics play no part********
- You can use the word "right" in different contexts. In this case we're talking about the fact that the government grants all people the ABILITY (since using theyuekit
- word right bothers you so much) to get married. It's not up to a random government employee somewhere to overrule that.yuekit
- Context shmontext, the word has a meaning regardless of your intentions to redefine it to suit your purposes********
- People aren't upset about the "right" to marry. They're upset about losing the right to not be discriminated against based on sexual orientation.********
- double negative nonsense********
- That's not a double negative. If you need help understanding: People want to be treated equally under the law, but are being discriminated against.********
- yea yea, i get it. it's not anyones right to get married though, it's a privilege, and the states vote on who the privilege gets extended to. the whole issue is********
- Actually if you are white straight n poor. good luck trying to go into lgbt business organization n get a business loan...yurimon
- quite boring, marriage is an ancient relic that nobody in the us gives a fuck about. look at the stats, it's a token issue to appease the young demographic********
- "states vote on who the privilege gets extended to" Except that Supreme court said that states can't discriminate over marriage, based on the 14th amendmentyuekit
- The whole idea of Constitutional rights is that some things should not be up for a vote.yuekit
- except that states can discriminate, you lost the plot buddy********
- Not when it comes to benefits of citizenship like marriage. That's what the Supreme Court ruling this summer was all about.yuekit