Scottish independence

Out of context: Reply #68

• Started
• Last post
• 363 Responses

• rosko_picachu0

  I think it went along the lines of, "Shoot, where can we dispose of these chemical weapons without it impacting the natural heritage of England's coastline and to cover it up, because their would be hell to pay if the English population didn't like that, whereas Ireland and Scotland can just be ignored, probably because the population isn't big enough or perhaps because it never had a voice. Like i said, out of sight out of mind. Short term policy, long term effect. Even last year plans were being discussed to dispose of England's nuclear waste in Scotland before a referendum vote. This is how unimportant Scotland's natural heritage is to some daft politicians.

  rosko_picachu 0Permalink

  UpvoteDownvote

  Flag

  • Maybe not the fact that Scotland is so big yet not as populated therefor less people effected maybe? more likely no?sem
  • But no, I'm sure rather than the most likely reason your right instead. England are just doing it to be dicks. Very mature argument there.sem
  • you're*sem

  Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note

  SaveCancel

View thread