Open Carry in America

Out of context: Reply #29

  • Started 11 years ago
  • Last post 8 years ago
  • 180 Responses
  • iCanHazQBN0

    Yurimon, no amount of personal weaponry could stand a chance against a potential tyrannical government's (eg. America's) military.

    You cannot be pro-gun, and yet continue to support and be willing to spend a huge portion of our national budget on the military. It would be contradictory to do so, as it goes completely against the argument of bearing arms in order to form a militia. Your militia would be as effective as a preschool classroom in any kind of modern war situation. You might as well be caring squirt guns instead of AK47's.

    So..... are you for SIGNIFICANTLY defunding the military? Because as long as the military is as powerful as it is, it doesn't matter if we are disarmed (or armed) "sheep".

    You can't have it both ways.

    • That was the original intention. Miltia needs to update then if thats the case.yurimon
    • It always matters if society is armed in a capacity to defend. it makes huge difference.yurimon
    • Militia needs to update?? To match the current technology of the US military???...iCanHazQBN
    • ...Are you out of your mind?iCanHazQBN
    • Good luck suppling your militia with some F-35 jets!!iCanHazQBN
    • I'm sorry but if you think militias can simply "update" to match the capabilities of the US military...iCanHazQBN
    • ... then there's no use debating this topic with you. Your head isn't screwed on correctly.iCanHazQBN
    • 2nd of all 70% of soldiers wont fire on US population.yurimon

View thread