Apple.com responsive?
Apple.com responsive?
Out of context: Reply #45
- Started
- Last post
- 51 Responses
- jtb260
This is starting to sound a lot like the debate on whether or not to support IE6. Folks were screaming that 5-10% of browsers were still in and that was 5-10% they couldn't ignore.
Now mobile browsers account for 30-50% of mobile traffic (from what I've seen on clients sites). Don't see how you can ignore that.
m. sites usually mean that you have to manage two code bases for the front end, and it's just not feasible. On top of that, designing desktop first leaves you with a lot of problems when you try to scale down for mobile. That's why mobile first.
Just go read everything Luke W. has written on the topic.
- 30-50% of overall traffic.jtb26
- Luke worbleski bomb just got dropped... Shit got real. That dude is the kingHombre_Lobo
- I remember first making responsive sites and thinking screw mobile first... I quickly regretted it. It's aceHombre_Lobo