Apple.com responsive?

Out of context: Reply #44

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 51 Responses
  • Hombre_Lobo0

    Just spotted ephix comment here -
    http://www.qbn.com/topics/685178…
    (having it non responsive was part of showing how the iPhone can display the full web) That's a pretty solid argument, v good point dude.

    At launch that seems like a very wise choice and helpful to their marketing. By now though when smart phones are well understood by most I would have thought they would be responsive for improved usability.

    This thread has some good discussion in it though. v interesting how some people still prefer the desktop site for usability.

    However Preferring a desktop site because it has more options is just poor workmanship by the designer / dev, a lot of top ux dudes argue you should never omit features / options / content based on different screens sizes.

View thread