Apple.com responsive?
Apple.com responsive?
Out of context: Reply #33
- Started
- Last post
- 51 Responses
- hotroddy0
etm@ there are parts of the apple.com that have no need to go mobile.
1. In some instances they decided against stacking elements top to bottom when you can swipe horizontally. Why stack top to bottom if you can get away with scrolling right to left.
2. I would like to see this section resolved for phone using css media quires:
http://www.apple.com/30-years/Responsive design isn't deep. CSS media queries?? Is that so hard? All I'm saying that when you design for mobile FIRST you're setting up trap where your desktop site will look, scale, resize function like windows.com
- You are aware that right to left swiping is fully available on mobile.ETM
- Fucking lol! That page IS responsive guy. Save the menu/footer on the first page.ETM
- Did you click any of the timelines on a phone? Works perfect, scaled and stacked. Font size changes etc.ETM
- You should look at their CSS. Basically, to me, any further argument from you has not validity.ETM
- * no validity.ETM
- And to finish, anyone who has WELL designed a responsive property, knows it's a bit more than just shallow, media queries.ETM
- queries.ETM
- if it works than what are you arguing?hotroddy
- 30-years page is NOT responsive. Post a screenshot. It works just like on desktop. Actually desktop has hover sliding which shows it was meant for desktop.hotroddy
- *it relies heavily on hover state which shows you it wasn't meant for mobile. And no extra care for mobile.hotroddy
- Post a screenshot? You don't own a smartphone?ETM
- That explains a lot, I guess.ETM
- a screenshot says a thousand words which is why you are reluctant to post.hotroddy
- i'm done arguing with idiots 20 words at a time.hotroddy
- I'm saying open the fucking page on your own phone and INTERACT with it. Seriously, WTF?ETM
- Again... explains A LOT.ETM
- The world goes the direction it goes, regardless of your own ideals of how it should be.ETM