Apple.com responsive?
Apple.com responsive?
Out of context: Reply #22
- Started
- Last post
- 51 Responses
- hotroddy0
Responsive design is ONE website made to scale to different screens (most notably phones) using css.
The fact that you have to scale something so it fits on a smaller screen limits your options thereby making it look GENERIC. Collapsable menus, fluid grids, top to bottom scrolling... etc are all the RAGE thus resulting in a trendy and ever so generic style.
It's actually a lazy/easier way of building a website rather than building two separate sites ( *still only one backend) - One for mobile/touch events and one for desktop/mouse events.
- Nonsense. What about extra wide screens...? Tablets...... ?set
- tablets, extra wide screens have (relatively) same aspect ratio. Phones, however portrait orientation forces responsivenesshotroddy
- *phones forces you to be responsive due to it's orientation.. from my experienceshotroddy
- ie. you have to stack elements below one anotherhotroddy
- You have no ideaset
- this whole post is nonsense... responsive isn't about scaling, it's a rearrangement more than anythingmonospaced
- The Apple site HAS a generic responsive look to it... except it's not responsive.ETM
- It looks like it should stack and scale easily based on the arrangement of most sections.ETM