9/11
9/11
Out of context: Reply #86
- Started
- Last post
- 152 Responses
- GeorgesIV-1
Ukit, you really still don't know what was inside building 7,
comonnn mate it isn't that hard to google,
while you're at it google which companies where present at the floors the plane hit, I would give you the links but it's been freakin 12 years and I'm getting tired of reposting the same things(sorry if I sound smugg, but 9/11 isn't kennedy, the case is pretty much closed already because )
- what fuckn page did I read,
what year is this???GeorgesIV - So I have to buy the book to find out?ukit2
- no just google it or go to the author's page or youtube
http://www.youtube.c…GeorgesIV - I honestly wouldn't waste your time with ukit, he's so locked in to the programming, he's blind.set
- He's colorblind and simply refuses to believe in the possibility of colour. It's really rather pitiful, but also slightly humorousset
- Slightly humorous..set
- set it's called being skeptical. I'm not ruling anything out, I just want to see the evidence.ukit2
- Do the research then. If you still can't see it, I worry for you.set
- I don't see how you can say there is one obvious conclusion. Even people who think it was a false flag don't necessarily agree on what happened.ukit2
- necessarily agree on what happened.ukit2
- In terms of coverup I think the Saudi involvement is the trail to follow. Not what happened on the day itself as if some clue will reveal everything.ukit2
- will reveal everything.ukit2
- I'm just saying that the official story is bollocks.set
- "he's so locked in to the programming, he's blind" irony?hereswhatidid
- Noneset
- http://gifatron.com/…ukit2
- what fuckn page did I read,