Science

Out of context: Reply #37

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 1,008 Responses
  • Morning_star0

    Science and scientists regularly ignore The First Cause/Prime Mover issues and many of the problems associated with The Big Bang - the 'something from nothing' conundrum. Should science claim, as it regularly does, that there is no creator?

    • probability + time = "something from nothing" as you put itZOOP
    • Now who's talking about religion? ;)monospaced
    • There was no 'time' before the big bang.Morning_star
    • Also, scientists are doing everything except ignore it. They are constantly, relentlessly, testing it.monospaced
    • Not me Mono. I said creator not god.Morning_star
    • Billions of dollars and the best minds on the planet are dedicated to trying to (dis)prove the big bang theorymonospaced
    • god, creator, c'mon, we know that they're the same. It doesn't matter what word you choosemonospaced
    • Testing what Mono? You'll hear scientist claim things about millionths of a second after the big bang.Morning_star
    • Nothing about the cause.
      Morning_star
    • If you think they aren't looking at the cause, then you are just being ignorant.monospaced
    • Show me who and where.Morning_star
    • http://www.bbc.com/f…
      http://phys.org/news…
      monospaced
    • The BBC link doesn't work and the other one supports the many universes hypothesis. It doesn't address the First Cause issue.Morning_star
    • The link works fine, and both are trying to address the issue. Sigh.monospaced
    • I can't view the BBC one as the link is international, sorry. Hust watching the Dawkins Deepak thing, very interesting, thanksMorning_star

View thread