Fuk u shima

Out of context: Reply #9

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 44 Responses
  • prophetone0

    you can say what you like but i wholeheartedly disagree with people who love to point out the fine details to attempt disprove the bigger picture that right there in front of us.

    fact is, we are f*cking it all up. not atom bomb in one shot style but in little tiny steps. fukushima is one of those steps.

    i don't have to worry about being 'significantly affected'? here's the thing, we're talking radiation here it becomes a part of you little by little.

    this exact argument was delivered when they started using the full body x-ray machines at airports. 'oh it's not significant enough radiation...' - i'm sorry, have they taken a time machine to 40 years from now when they change their tune to 'we're seeing now due to all the cancer cases that those earlier machines were a really bad idea, whoops!'

    prophetone 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread