Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #17851
- Started
- Last post
- 33,773 Responses
- ukit20
I don't know how you ever reduce cost to the level where everyone who wants to be insured can be. No amount of bureaucracy and red tape cutting is going to make it profitable for insurance company to support someone who requires hundreds of thousands in care.
- insurance is a gamble. 100% insurance is no longer a gamble and raises rates for all with no controls.********
- i think insurance across statelines with multiple comapnies and making insurance individual vs company would allow more insurance********
- company would allow mor einsurance at cheaper rates for more people. and keep hospitals inline more tiered services********
- services and procedures. much like ferrari services vs chevy cobalts. Too much insurance makes them only offer ferrari services********
- i only partake in employer insurance becuase they cover so much of it and if i refused id see no extra money.********
- i think i could get a cheaper policy than what i pay+employer pays. But right now since they cover so much i go with it********
- with it. I'd rather have a small detrimental health policy and pay otu of pocket for dental +vision********
- My dental and vision thru employer is virtually nothing a month.DrBombay
- insurance is a gamble. 100% insurance is no longer a gamble and raises rates for all with no controls.