Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #16997
- Started
- Last post
- 33,773 Responses
- BonSeff0
pick a position, jazx.. you post articles to incite outrage, then you get called on it, and you are like, I agree, it's dodgy..
- would it be better if he ignored facts when presented with them?locustsloth
- is that a rhetorical question?BonSeff
- No, it's not. You can either complain about him ignoring facts, or complain about him shifting positions. Not both.locustsloth
- If you'll notice, BonSeff, panacea acts somewhat reasonably when treated reasonably.locustsloth
- his M/O has been the same since day one. but once again, thanks for weighing inBonSeff
- But seriously, BonSeff, would you rather he post articles that speak to his values and then pull back from his position after confronted, or would you rather he post and keep beating the point regardless of the facts to the contrary?locustsloth
- confronted, or would you rather he post and keep beating the point regardless of the facts to the contrary?locustsloth
- Because it seems like you just want to be against him, no matter what he says, which is odd to melocustsloth
- i may have agreed with 4 posts he has posted in the last 9 years.BonSeff
- most of the time he has no idea what he is even posting. its just a repost from some "BHO" blog he follows.BonSeff
- its disingenuous and annoying as fuck.BonSeff
- Put isn't refuting the points a more productive tact? As noted, it elicits a much different reaction from himlocustsloth
- i mean, maybe you enjoy the conflict, i don't know. Taking an even handed, objective approach agrees with me morelocustsloth
- To each his own, i supposelocustsloth
- No one should be interested in getting a good response out of a troll.DrBombay
- Everyone should be interested in the possibility of getting a good response from anyonelocustsloth