Kyoto Now!

Out of context: Reply #18

• Started
• Last post
• 21 Responses

• lowimpakt0

  yea, tar sands are just the type of way we produce energy in advanced societies..

  Considering a Harvard study showed that in the US alone the burning of coal alone COSTS society $345 billion in pollution and health impacts would it not make sense for Canada to drop the polluting vested interests because they actually cost society far more than Kyoto?

  http://www.reuters.com/article/2…

  no, ok let Canadians keep paying out more because their government can't deal with the complex reality..

  lowimpakt 0Permalink

  UpvoteDownvote

  Flag

  • You falsely assume the environmental cost of the oilsands are greater than other sources of oil.zarkonite
  • not really but do you have evidence that oil sands are less environmentally harmful?lowimpakt

  Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note

  SaveCancel

View thread