Interactive Development
Out of context: Reply #6
- Started
- Last post
- 6 Responses
- omg0
Lee Brimlow is a little late with his statement that Interactive doesn't mean Flash. When did he determine this? When all the mobile apps started appearing 2.5 years ago? Today, he has his epiphany?
I wonder if he holds any biases as a developer working over at Adobe. His posting insinuates that HTML5 and the many libraries it supports can do the simple tasks that Flash used to do, but he fails to mention that HTML5 also does the advanced things that Flash hopes and plans to do. Why would someone from ADOBE fail to mention that?
The idea that Flash does not support any other scripting language, other than its own, makes Flash a weak solution for advancement in better interactive products. If you plan on designing software with Flash, hopefully your client is Adobe.
- dude please STFU you have no clue about anything you are talking about. You are repeating shit you overheard somewhere and you don't even understand half of it at best. Just let it go.Boz
- somewhere and you don't even understand half of it at best. Just let it go.Boz
- Boz, you think you're smart... but those are just your thoughtsomg
- Yes, I overheard Lee Brimlow talk shit in his own posting. *smack*omg