Politics

Out of context: Reply #15034

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,770 Responses
  • TheBlueOne0

    Another thing to notice...Pelosi is immediately calling for an ethics investiagtion. When Vitter got caught in his prostitute scandal (phone records show him making arrangements for a hooker while he was on the Senate floor during a vote) the Republicans closed ranks and offered support ( http://blog.nola.com/updates/200… ) And that's the difference between the parties. The Republicans are at least vehemently loyal to their own (IMHO their only redeeming quality) while the Dems constantly shove each other under the bus.

    TheBlueOne 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • thats quite a broad generalization for party stuff. more speaking of pelosi. personally i hate reps team shit, especially with religion
      ********
    • shit especially with religion and all that falls out of it. rather have independant thoguht and goals then push numbers
      ********
    • but then again there really isnt any sacrificing for team amongst parties. party team is based on incentive
      ********
    • it's not a "broad generalization" it's a specific trait. I even gave examples.TheBlueOne
    • Not only is your grammar shit, your comprehension is obviously just as retardedTheBlueOne
    • so 100% reps backed vitter, and 1 dem didnt back wiener. that means reps stick to gether dems dont..... thats broad
      ********
    • your just trying to make it about a party.
      ********
    • You have dyslexia, maybe you should type less.DrBombay
    • perhaps. but doesnt say im not calling it as it is. party generlization on it has no linkage
      ********
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread