illegibility = good?

Out of context: Reply #3

• Started
• Last post
• 3 Responses

• ukit0

  Since it seems to be the rule around here, I'm going to declare "timeline" and note that this issue was already covered by QBN contributer jaylarson.

  http://www.qbn.com/topics/643655…

  Or should I say...

  ▼▼❊✤✤✤❊ ▼▼▼❊✄. ✵✶✷✸✹▼✺✻✼✽✾✿❏ ♥❂❂❂? ▼✺✻✼✽ ▼❊✤✤✤✶ ✹▼✺✻✼ ✽✾. ❊✤✤✤✶ ✹▼✺✻ ✹▼✺✻✼ ✹▼✺▼▼▼✻✼ ✺✻✼ ✽✾. ❊✤✤✤✶ ✺✻ ✼✽✾✿❏! ✻✼ ✽✾. ❊✤✤✤✶ ✹▼✺✻.

  ukit 0Permalink

  UpvoteDownvote

  Flag

  • Oh. Darn. I did check.
    Not enough, clearly.detritus
  • Oh well. Who really cares?ukit
  • i hadn't read it before!Hench
  • What does it mean?!jaylarson

  Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note

  SaveCancel

View thread