GAP to return to old logo
GAP to return to old logo
Out of context: Reply #50
- Started
- Last post
- 72 Responses
- rusty_ace0
I'm open to new good design. not bad new design. It was just a bad logo.I would hope that logo had to be a watered down version of the original design...in the end that logo was probably designed by committee which ended up unremarkable and hated. They didn't gain anything by redesigning it, other then out cry, however good or bad the original logo was...it was unmistakable. the fact that the new logo needed a gradient to keep it legible...should tell you a lot.