Politics
Out of context: Reply #13122
- Started
- Last post
- 33,769 Responses
- ********0
Yea shoot in the face is rough. But i figure a stricter measure would be necessary. If a free market approach didnt level the playing field. Have illegal immigrants anally raped. Something that outweighs the risk, supple and demand risk reward is a balance that needs to be tested and weighed.
The insurance thing. You dont have to get shot in the face but you may go without care. For the few sad sob stories a populace is suffering with rising healthcare and social costs. Its sad but not all life is unicorn and rainbows, adults shoudl understand this. The rules in place cause far more suffering on a whole. Like i said americans are fond of subsidization, we even subsidize our suffering. Personal responsibility is a hard thing to accept it, its not for everyone, but the idea is to keep a level playing field by acknowledging whats unfair and cause the problems. Free to work for what you can get, same gov amenities. What would the problem be besides, the spoiled handout kids bitching and moaning they dont get their free support.
And its a generalization but id say a pretty accurate one. Just think about it and apply it to those times when you feel frustrated or want to complain. And if you take help from a person on the street its a different response then getting magical help from no one you know. Much liek stealing from an individual or a corporation. There are different connections in such cases. Different emotions and psychology going on. Most generalizations will simply be that. But i guarantee more people accept help feeling they deserve it and more then they get, vs those who are grateful for the help. We have a spoiled rich kid handout culture mentality which is really ridiculous.
But most importantly would something like that not be the midground level playing field so we can all benefit. Straight up supply demand.
- and dotn forget the point of the article i figure you liek substance, but the article is being passed as substance. which is sad********
- and thats what is more appalling. that peopel who vote care more for party team then substance.********
- better politics require intelligent people. the worse the politics the worse the mob.********
- You do realize that your proposal would never happen in a million years, right?DrBombay
- Or doesn't that matter? Libertarian with his head in the clouds.DrBombay
- yup i said it likely wouldnt fly. but if it was up to me i think soemthign along those lines is what i would work for********
- How about viable solutions instead of candyland?DrBombay
- its perfectly viable. just outnumbered. other ideas consist of doing whatw ere doing and whining********
- Shooting people in the face is a viable solution in your retarded head?DrBombay
- i suggested leveling the playing field. accepting cheap labor. the shot in face was facetious.********
- and dotn forget the point of the article i figure you liek substance, but the article is being passed as substance. which is sad