Politics

Out of context: Reply #13034

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,770 Responses
  • DrBombay0

    Greenspan Says Congress Should Let Bush Era Tax Cuts Expire
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/20…

    This isn't the specter of doom of the "re-distribution of wealth" that some people paint it as. It just rolls things back to 2001 before Bush did a very dangerous thing and borrowed tons of money without any way of paying it back, sending the value of the dollar down the toilet. Letting these tax cuts expire would bring in 650 billion dollars a year in revenue.

    And before any one of you protest this, it will not effect any of your broke asses one bit.

    • how many of our broke asses will be out of jobs with this plan?
      ********
    • Stop trying to scare people, you are a fucking serf. Stop sucking rich dick.DrBombay
    • Prove that it will kill jobs.DrBombay
    • Stats, figures, actual evidence of it. Not your asshole opinion.DrBombay
    • well i know that 650 billion isnt money thats simply not in play and just sitting outside of the economy.
      ********
    • deathboy, these guys are obamatrons. It's to late for them. They will be a slave to the black man.
      ********
    • You know whats funnier? Blacks are going to be a slave to a black man LOL
      ********
    • if its savings, or investments and gets pulled what will happen, if a company has a profit margin to meet that means cutbacks...
      ********
    • really what makes you beleive 650 billion can be had with 0 consequences
      ********
    • Things were fine when the tax rate was higher. You are gullible as fuck.DrBombay
    • "Stats, figures, actual evidence of it"
      No? STFU then.
      DrBombay
    • its just common sense, cant have your cake and eat it too. your argument should be the 650b could go towards more government jobs. but then you still have debt and more overhead
      ********
    • gov jobs. but then you still have debt and increase overhead.
      ********
    • We lived in dark times before George Bush then apparently.DrBombay
    • way before bush. i wouldnt have agreed with the tax cuts then, but now an economy has adjusted to them
      ********
    • and your gonna have to break some eggs if you want to go back.
      ********
    • i dont like politics being used to alter states of economy for elections.
      ********
    • This was a key campaign issue for all of the democrats 3 years ago, it isn't just because of the election.DrBombay
    • Look at the debt this country had before Obama became president. It wouldn't be nearly that bad with all of that revenue coming in for 7 years.DrBombay
    • revenue coming in for 7 years.DrBombay
    • And by your logic the 2000's should have been a boom time and it wasn't. Please do not invoke 9/11.DrBombay
    • how bout medicare. repubs have tax cuts dems have handouts both are wrong in my book. its not there place
      ********
    • just think about the logic behind fdr's economic bill of rights and you will find a lot of error. since there is none
      ********
    • and i dont support war and or supporting a facist state with corp tax deals and lawful help
      ********
    • im just a man who wants right and right isnt very politically cool these days. but thats politics a war for the same both sides screwed
      ********
    • sides get screwed unless you play the political game
      ********
    • You live in fantasy land.DrBombay

View thread