Politics

Out of context: Reply #12572

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,770 Responses
  • ukit0

    "congress decides through mob rule."

    I see, so you got a problem with the 14th and 15th Amendment too? 19th Amendment? What about the rest of the Civil Rights Bill?

    ukit 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • i got problem when a democracy forgets about inalienable rights and turns into mob rule.
      ********
    • I got problem!DrBombay
    • Rick, you are one shrill little bitch. I can hear your high pitched nag voice even through your writing.mathinc
    • There are tons of people on here who fuck up grammar. But it's only the people you don't agree with who get this sort ofmathinc
    • treatment. Childish.mathinc
    • He has an illogical viewpoint and shitty grammar, the perfect combination for ridicule. You can agree with him if you like.DrBombay
    • The illogical viewpoint depends on whoever is doing the 'viewing.' I think your viewpoint is batshit crazy but I appreciatemathinc
    • your right to a differing viewpoint without belittling you constantly. The grammar.. man look around this thread...mathinc
    • You belittle me daily, quit this high horse bullshit and get off my cock.DrBombay
    • You're demented.mathinc
    • You called me childish and demented in this note section alone. Yet somehow you don't belittle people? Go buy a gun and I will borrow u a bullet.DrBombay
    • and I will borrow you a bullet.DrBombay
    • if you cant understadn becuas eof bad grammar or mispellings how can you determine its illogical?
      ********
    • i think you can read it jsut fine, but dont agree with it, but cant rationally explain why so you turn to insults
      ********
    • I think all libertarians are boneheads. They frame everything in free-market rhetoric whether it fits or not.DrBombay
    • It is an illogical worldview that has never ever been tested and has like 3 members of gov for a reason. It is half baked.DrBombay
    • You can disagree, it's fine. I welcome you to run for office and lose.DrBombay
    • thats a statement with no rational follow through. and why such a large generalization when its not called for
      ********
    • called for. when its more direct about individual equal rights. wheres your take on the content at hand
      ********
    • large party generalizations are worthless
      ********
    • Run for office.DrBombay
    • I don't think people had more rights before the CRA, you do. Because you are an idiot.DrBombay
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread